They are putting the constitution aside to treat terrorist suspects as not having unalienable rights? As if these rights only apply to a preferred people?
Today Bush signed a bill passed by Congress in September. The bill forbids treatment of detainees that would constitute war crimes - such as torture, rape and biological experiments - but gives the president the authority to decide which other techniques interrogators can use. The law does not require that detainees be granted legal representation. It also bars non-US citizens from filing habeas corpus petitions challenging their detentions in federal court.
Civil liberties groups say the law does still not guarantee detainees' rights, and legal challenges are to be expected.
AMERICA!!! Habeas corpus is the heart of the bill of rights!
There are about 450 to 500 detainees at Guantanamo (who Bush automatically, unjustifiably, and discriminately describe as the "bad people") who will continue to NOT have these basic rights
2006-10-17
08:59:47
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Jerry H
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Besides me, does anyone else have a problem with this?
Here is a very good illustration to describe the reasoning in America today: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodo
2006-10-17
09:00:09 ·
update #1