nuke them first. that'll just about send them into oblivion.
much like we should have done to Afghanistan, Iraq et. al. on Sept. 12.
2006-10-17 08:16:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by luke_r1996 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
whats up i've got have been given a good greater advantageous theory, Fatman: how approximately we do away with a number of your foodstuff and feed it to ravenous North Koreans so as that they do no longer could consume their babies anymore. Then possibly they might start to enhance the beginnings of a civil society. It is mindless to place embargoes up against people who already have easily no longer something. The isolation they have been subjected to so a techniques has led to untold suffering between those human beings already and it has purely served to reinforce Kim Il Jongs carry on the rustic. Why do you think of ravenous them even further is going to harm the single person interior the rustic who has some wealth? Are you afraid there purely isn't sufficient vast Macs left over for you as quickly as the N Koreans have eaten? Your thoughts is obviously clouded with grease. we could constantly deliver you over there to offer them a huge hug. you are able to finally end up interior the frying pan.
2016-10-02 09:39:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
give them 958.5 billion dollars, cancell all international debts, promise them 3 aircraft carriers, 15 battleships, 6 nuclear subs, 100 tanks, 250 F15s, 10 B52 bombers, 5 stealth jets, 28 Apache helicopters, and 9 trillion mega-tons of rice.
2006-10-17 08:33:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think anyone will vote for you because you are fat. We don't like fat people in america. Your hug program might work though. It's better than Bush's plan "Lets piss them off until they shoot a nuke at us".
2006-10-17 08:26:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by TotalSmashism 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's going on here? I thought this was a site where people ask questions (interrogative statements designed to test knowledge) because they truly want to know the answer. Instead we get "questions" like these which aren't questions at all, but simply challenges to people you don't agree with. How pathetic!
2006-10-17 08:43:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We also need to beg for their forgiveness and give them a few billion dollars.
2006-10-17 08:44:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jon C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
And how exactly is Bush going to stop them? Cheerlead them to death?
2006-10-17 08:20:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bomb the hell out of their nuclear facilities...we know where most of them are.
2006-10-17 08:20:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by 3810trebor@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not a question. Hug 'this'!
2006-10-17 08:50:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by onionheadinvancouver 3
·
0⤊
0⤋