How you to evaluate this article of the notice and disagreement?

Question

a) Article of the notice of the astrophysical Marcelo Gleiser: It says in the fantastic one that the moon appeared for the breaking above of colliding asteroid with the land. b) Disagreement of the designer and the scientist self-taught Tarcísio Brito: All the physical theory is always provisory in the direction of being only a hypothesis: But the moon and the land, well the all the bodies that with them if interactive in the these mechanics of the universe; it always existed and always it will exist - for all the lives of the cycle of our alternating history the lives of the cycle of daily pag-History. It donates who to finds it, consequently is fact, to the exception of the unconscious ones, or demagogues that they ignore this truth.

Answer 1

Have you been running some sci fi back and forth through an online translation service?

Answer 2

It does sound like something that's been run through something like Babelfish.

If I were to make a guess, it could be related to the theory that the Moon was formed as a result of a collision of a planetesimal with the early Earth with the debris coming together. In that case, computer models seem to indicate that it is possible but only under specific circumstances.