Why does Madonna get to be the exception??? Next they'll grant Michael Jackson adoption rights..... do u think Madonna thought about what the CHILD will go thru!?!?!?
2006-10-17 06:37:20 · 14 answers · asked by costellos_creation 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It's all about money. I don't think someone with her dubious morals is fit to be a mother irrespective of her personal fortune.
2006-10-17 06:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This an example of the true colors of the Malawian govt. and their greed. They are willing to sell the babies if the bid is high enough, but would prefer to keep these kids in underfunded shelters than to give them to parents who can provide for their needs. Comparing MJ and Madge is like apples and oranges. Of course Madonna thought about what the child will go through. He will be an heir to her fortune. Gee, I think that's better than growing up in a group home without the love of any parent in a country with one of the highest HIV rates in the world. It's not making an exception for Madonna that is wrong, it's keeping these poor children in the deplorable conditions they are in that makes this country's govt. so bad. Not Madonna. As an adoptive parent of two kids born here in the USA I will tell you and anyone else this. Until you adopt at least one child in need of a home, you have absolutely no right to criticize anyone else who has or wants to.
2006-10-17 07:22:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it incredibly is heavily exciting and attractiveness why it incredibly is not any longer on the information? in all probability will hit the "stands" and political courses on Thursday. ask your self how long it would be tied up in courtroom. fantastic that the Congress had a committee that suggested merely 3 or the a million,3 hundred coverage companies denied 20,000 claims and dropped the human beings, yet interior the advise time saved $3 hundred million. the excuses in accordance to the committee suggested the excuses have been trivial. pondering the human beings have been ill it in all probability wasn't exciting suing the coverage companies. 2d why could no longer they do something bout working something out for extra opposition as that does tension expenditures down. thank you for the link and have a great 2010. I nevertheless sense the $3.7 billion* the lobbyists and others donated to the residing house and Senate had something to do with the "smoke and mirrors" and the certainty that no longer something is getting achieved. even nonetheless the hospitals did improve their donations via sixty 5% to $500 million in 2008 in anticipation of it passing and searching after the criminal and unlawful human beings coming to the ERs. I study yet another article a on an analogous time as decrease back that suggested over one hundred hospitals had closed because of this, yet unsure if solid. this could end it for the state's rights yet nevertheless would not sparkling up the priority.
2016-12-13 09:57:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think its right how the madonna was able to adopt a child there when that country doesnt allow other countries to adopt from there. i heard about this last night on the news. madonna went and donated money to the country so that she could have that little boy
2006-10-17 07:07:54 · answer #4 · answered by Jeppy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is all about the $$, I think she donated something like $3 million to them. Think about all the parents over here who are trying to adopt in other countries and can't, i'm sure they are frustrated that celebrities like Madonna, etc. can just do it so easily because they have all the money in the world. :: stepping off her soap box ::
2006-10-17 06:45:22 · answer #5 · answered by aloneinga 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sad to say,but some "celebrities" are adopting 3rd world kids to use like fashion accessories. Why could'nt Madonna and others like her, leave the kids where their roots are and sponsor them throughout their school years?
2006-10-17 06:48:26 · answer #6 · answered by Taylor29 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I heard she contributed something like $300 mill to them.
I also believe overseas adoption should be banned in the U.S.. We've got too many kids in the system here who need to be adopted.
2006-10-17 06:48:55 · answer #7 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do you care?? As long as children are getting the homes and families they need then what's wrong with that?!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-10-17 08:16:07 · answer #8 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Money talks.
2006-10-17 07:24:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It seems that there are different standards for celebrities.
2006-10-17 07:35:12 · answer #10 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋