Also did they ever compete at the same time in a running event?
2006-10-17 06:08:22 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Olympics
Flo Jo's 100m & 200m PRs are the current WRs of 10.49 (this mark is suspected to be highly wind-assisted, but the wind-gauge malfunctioned and showd up as 0.0 - her next best 'legal' wind time was 10.61] & 21.34
I cannot recall JJK's 100m PR, but her 200m PR was 22.30 which would leave her far behind Flo-Jo's best 200m efforts
In a nutshell: Flo-Jo was much faster than JJK. JJK was a greater all-rounder than Flo-Jo
2006-10-17 09:49:07 · answer #1 · answered by NLS 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
FGJ was definetly faster- I don't beleive they ever competed head to head but in terms of overall times during races I think Joyner consistently had the better times
2006-10-17 06:18:17 · answer #2 · answered by geom1974 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flo Jo was faster 10:49 in the 100m. Jackie was a Hep athlete who when doing individual events did the 100m hurdles and long jump. Flo only did the 100m and 200m
2006-10-17 06:31:28 · answer #3 · answered by moglie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To tall guy - It was never proved that they did steroids, you fish-eyed fool.
You can not compare the two ladies. Flo-Jo was a sprinter. Jackie did the heptathlon.
2006-10-17 11:31:16 · answer #4 · answered by smitty 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
FloJo was a sprinter whereas Jackie did the heptathlon and was not as fast but was versatile and strong.
2006-10-18 04:48:24 · answer #5 · answered by Jim G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends who and when they are using steroids (!)
2006-10-17 06:16:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋