Militaristic Republican sometimes say "nuke 'em" in response to a foreign policy question. Could this solution actually have side-benefits?
2006-10-17 04:33:05 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wouldn't be surprised if Republicans actually believed that.
2006-10-17 04:39:52 · answer #1 · answered by brian2412 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Certainly not to Northern Europe at least, who are looking forward to becoming exactly like Greenland when the Gulf Stream stops flowing.
It's the end of our summers, I'm afraid. I take it as a personal offense if someone "denies" global warming. It's hardly a comfort to have been right when you need to use parkas in July.
2006-10-17 11:42:45 · answer #2 · answered by dane 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it quite works that way. Would be like cutting off the remaining arm of a one-arm-man in order for him to regain his balance. I don't think that would be good for that man.
2006-10-17 11:45:04 · answer #3 · answered by The answer man 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It might help if global warming existed. However since it doesn't, I'm fairly certain it would be pretty bad.
2006-10-17 12:11:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sure, Vikings lived in the cold, maybe it'll eliminate blacks from the face of the earth for good.
2006-10-17 12:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by Bucket O' Chickin 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
aparantly global warming is its own cure, were suppose t have a very cold winter
2006-10-17 11:40:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think if they strike us first, they have it coming. It would be the best thing for the North Koreans.
2006-10-17 11:39:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋