English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Anyone qualified in Sports Science or similar please answer this.

2006-10-17 04:20:59 · 33 answers · asked by hairyleftone 1 in Sports Other - Sports

33 answers

Running uses less energy because you do it quicker. It may seem like more but you are just using the readily available emergency energy. Running utilizes the spring in your muscles and the ruthm of your weight.
Walking requires prolonged constant muscle activity and gives time to draw from the long time stores (fat)

2006-10-17 04:34:43 · answer #1 · answered by jekin 5 · 0 0

Well I know a lot of people have said yes, as if it's obvious, but I heard that it's not true. The logic in that being that you are still actually doing the same amount of excercise. You are doing the same distance but you will be running for less time than if you were walking. If you were running or walking for a certain amount of time then you would burn more calories by running, but for the same distance, it won't make much difference, if any, because running does burn more calories but you would be walking for a longer time. If you see what I mean.

2006-10-17 11:18:22 · answer #2 · answered by Evil J.Twin 6 · 0 0

Technically, for the same amount of distance, the work done is the same. So, at the moment you stop running the mile, you burn the same calories as walking the mile. You run harder but in less time, which equals to walking longer but going at a slower rate. Some of these answers here assume the duration time of walking and running are the same....untrue.

However, your body reacts to strenous excercise and your muscle will form microscopic 'tears' (the reason why legs hurt the next day). When these tears are in the process of healing, the muscle becomes bigger and tighter. It takes a lot of calories to maintain muscle so in fact, you are continually burning calories after you run.

When you walk, your body just goes, "oh, this isn't strenous, no need to build more muscle."

2006-10-17 04:28:40 · answer #3 · answered by leikevy 5 · 2 2

Running a mile and walking a mile would yield the same calories burn. The only different is that you finish sooner if you run. Let say you spent 10 minutes running and 10 minutes walking. Ten minutes of running would burned more calories than 10 minutes of walking.

2006-10-17 04:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by steve 6 · 1 1

no, a mile is a mile no matter what pace you run it at. walking or running will both burn the same amount of calories. the only thing that would change that would be a person's weight. a heavier person will burn more calories during a mile than a smaller person.

2006-10-17 05:08:47 · answer #5 · answered by mike a 1 · 0 1

yes you do... the amount of calories you burn is directly proportional to the amount of work you have to do, therefore the faster you walk or run, the more calories you will burn because it takes more energy to move faster... if you want to try it out just go to a local gym and get on a tredmill that has a calorie counter and watch how long it takes to burn calories in slower speeds verses faster speeds

2006-10-17 04:31:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

you're able to in all probability burn extra energy and could somewhat get extra cardio advantages from a 30-minute stroll. the rationalization only being time - 7-8 minutes isn't long adequate on your blood vessels to enhance completely, on your oxygen point in the bloodstream to height, and so on. you choose a minimum of 20-half-hour of greater heart fee and respiration to get cardio advantages. That being pronounced, intensity somewhat burns extra energy, yet what's extreme for one individual is probably no longer extreme for yet another. A marathon working ought to jog a mile and could in ordinary terms burn some hundred energy while somebody who develop into grossly out of shape ought to burn a million,000 energy attempting to run a mile. the terrific choose is your HEARTRATE. The marathon runner's heartrate could in all probability in ordinary terms boost slightly from a cushty jog, while an obese undeserving individual could have very intense heartrate from doing the comparable workouts - so as that they could burn many extra energy. there is one very final variable it somewhat is the tie-breaker between low and intense intensity routines and that's the calorie burning that occurs when you end work out. intense intensity routines that final extra beneficial than half-hour (and that i advise intense intensity, intense heartrate, non-end cardio) will proceed burning energy at an greater point for as much as two-3 HOURS when you end understanding. Low intensity routines which incorporate strolling do no longer supply this earnings.

2016-12-08 16:12:46 · answer #7 · answered by money 4 · 0 0

I am not qualified but the answer is yes since the heart rate is faster than if you walk. This results to more energy being used by the body to supply oxygen to your body.

2006-10-17 04:29:38 · answer #8 · answered by ngina 5 · 1 0

Well... when one runs he/she exerts much more energy than one who walks!!!
eg; if a 5'10" moderately active male weighing 150lbs walks at a speed of 3mph for 10min he burns 50 calories... however; if he walks at a speed of 5mph for the same amount of time he burns 93 calories!!!

2006-10-17 04:35:35 · answer #9 · answered by AM 1 · 0 0

Yes

2006-10-17 07:11:56 · answer #10 · answered by Curly Top 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers