English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-17 04:20:06 · 7 answers · asked by aBranch@60-WA ,<>< 4 in Entertainment & Music Movies

7 answers

Tippi Hedren was an excellent choice and you know how picky Alfred Hitchcock was. Tippi was sexy in an unobscure way and the chemistry between her and Rod Taylor was phenomenal and definitely believeable. I've seen Madonna's earlier movies and she played quite well for those "trendy" characters. I could not tolerate her in Evita. She would be equally disastrous in a remake of the Birds. As someone mentioned, it would be interesting to see how the special effects could come across; however, as a Hitchcock fan, I'd prefer they leave a classic what it is - a classic.

2006-10-17 05:50:12 · answer #1 · answered by terryoulboub 5 · 0 0

In the past, the man’s ability to support a family was, in my opinion, overvalued… above the woman who also made significant contributions to the family unit. In previous generations the only means of security open to women was finding a man to marry. Today women have a world of opportunities afforded to them that were not previously available. I think the majority of married men agree that their wife (working or not) has a significant and important role, and does not look down on but rather appreciates the role as stay-at-home parent. However, some people value capitalism over all else… There was a question on this page a few days ago about divorce; asking if a women deserves 50% of the martial property in a divorce. One person made the analogy... if the marriage was a company who is worth (or deserves more) the CEO or the janitor. That has stuck with me because I didn’t think people still looked at women who decide to become stay-at-home parents as unimportant. Attitudes take many generations to change and I am optimistic that we are headed in the right direction.

2016-05-22 08:40:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Madonna would be a great choice for musicals, like Evita, I havent seen the Birds, but if its pure acting, then they should choose someone else

2006-10-17 05:24:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Love Hitchcock, it would be great to see what they could do w/ the effects today. I think Madonna would be a terrible choice though. You would think they would want someone who could actually act.

2006-10-17 04:29:36 · answer #4 · answered by melonamc 3 · 0 0

Madge can't act, have you seen 'Desperately Seeking Susan' & 'Shang-hai Surprise'?
Why do you think she keeps marrying people in the film trade, it's a case of no part in your film then no nookie for hubby.

2006-10-17 04:52:01 · answer #5 · answered by SteveUK 5 · 0 0

good movie, bad actress/singer for lead role

2006-10-17 04:28:07 · answer #6 · answered by mysticideas 6 · 0 0

nope. scarlet johnanson

2006-10-17 06:08:52 · answer #7 · answered by the older big kid who helped invent dirt 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers