They have no use to society. All they do is take and they do not give back at all, draining us of precious tax dollars. Why should we waste time teaching a 19 year old retarded person to spell "CAT", while teachers could be teaching a normal person how to perform valuable surgical procedures, for example. It just makes no sense and it is sickening.
2006-10-17 04:05:26 · 7 answers · asked by Freg M 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
What you are suggesting is worryingly similar to ethnic cleansing. Very popular with a group called the Nazis in the 30s and 40s. I would suggest that narrow minded, aggressive, uneducated individuals such as yourself have far less use in society. Why not try growing up and expanding your mind a little-? People with learning difficulties are still the sons, daughters, brothers and sisters of other people- and contribute a great deal to their lives. Try thinking before asking moronic questions phrased in a deliberately aggressive tone. The only sickening thing is that individuals such as yourself can still hold such pathetic, backward views in the Twenty-First Century.
2006-10-17 07:50:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why are amoral human beings allowed to stay? I comprehend retardation is far diverse than being amoral, retardation is something one cant conquer and accomplish issues regardless. i'm talking approximately amoral people who will no longer be able to think of any humane concepts in any respect, no psychological administration, sh*t on themselves each time they talk, all the flaws having no morals. implys they are ineffective to society in certainty they seem to be a leech to society requiring consistent supervision. if no longer incarceration they gained't improve technologies, literature, artwork or something for that count. i've got self assurance we could continuously merely do because of the fact the Romans did and execute them as teenagers if we come across they have a severe loss of morals. as quickly as I quiet down and decide to have teenagers if my newborn became amoral (please no) i might provide it up for adoption the 2d i found out. My newborn would be a contributing member of society, no longer a leech which will do no longer something with its pitiful existence. I project you all to offer me one solid reason that's no longer clouded via thoughts unto why we could continuously enable them to stay.
2016-12-13 09:53:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i doubt that the teacher that is teaching how to spell cat could teach "valuable surgical procedures."
2006-10-17 04:26:13 · answer #3 · answered by *KiM* 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What do you mean, they don't contribute to society. I've seen people with mental retardation working, which means they pay taxes just like you and me.
2006-10-17 04:25:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are sadly mistaken. Do some more research. It is a shame. Not one 'retarded' person would ever speak badly of you.
2006-10-17 04:18:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
So why don't you off yourself, then? Do the world a favor.
2006-10-17 04:18:31 · answer #6 · answered by Girl Wonder 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WHY SHOULD YOU BE ALLOWED TO LIVE YOU STUPID IDIOT THAT WAY OF THINKING WENT OUT WITH THE DAYS OF HITLER !!!!!!!!
2006-10-17 04:22:02 · answer #7 · answered by starr 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋