I agree.
2006-10-17 04:06:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vanilla C 3
·
5⤊
4⤋
He can easily win "worst president of the century"!
If he earns only 2 points for every new enemy he makes he would be in level 7! This is not so smart.
Claiming to be Christian, isn't it supposed that "Bush" turns the other cheek if he was hit on one?
Instead of turning his cheek he attacks the innocent civilians n children in THEIR OWN country when THEY NEVER ATTACKED HIM FIRST! He is at war without even being hit on the cheek BY ANY OF THESE PEOPLE! he already got Saddam! His soldiers in Iraq, the Arabian Gulf area, Afghanistan and in Guantanamo."thou shall not kill"! or is it "thou shall not kill only one!" He is a shame to Christianity; you don't save the world by wars.
hope the next president can fix this mess, hopefully before it's too late.
2006-10-18 22:28:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Everyone complains about the crappy job that the president is doing. How easy of a job do you think it is?
He's in charge of running the top super power in the world. He keeps sending troops to Iraq and Afghanistan to try and stop terrorism. Not to get them killed.
We have stopped acts of terrorism since the troops were there, we have captured Saddam Hussein, we have captured other war criminals as well.
What is he supposed to do about this stuff? Sit on his butt and twiddle his thumbs? No, because that would make a crappy president. Do you think he likes sending troops there? Don't you think he would like to be a president serving our country during peace time.
Everyone complains but no one puts their names on presidential ballots come election time. Has there ever been a president that people are happy with?
Kennedy? He was just as much of a male slut as Clinton. The only difference is that Clinton got caught.
Reagan? He threw our economy into a tailspin. Everyone wants to complain but no one wants to do anything about it.
I say put up or shut up.
Sorry for the lengthy rant.
2006-10-17 04:14:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I hear a lot of people say "Bush shouldn't be president".
You know, it's not like he is entitled to it because he won the election two years ago and we're stuck with him for another two years. There are policies and procedures in place in our constitution to remove presidents and other politicians we as the people don't like or don't feel is doing well.
If you truly don't beleive Bush should be president, stop complaining here about it, and start organizing like minded people to utilize the policies and procedures in our constitution to remove him from office. If the majority of the people agree with you, he'll be removed from the presidency, and then you can start complaining about the guy who will take his place for the rest of his term - Cheney.
Personally, I think Bush is doing a decent job given the situation he was handed. Do I like his Iraq policies? No. Am I glad he isn't eligible for re-election? Yes. But being president is a tough job, and I don't envy the man one bit.
2006-10-17 04:12:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris H 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I still feel he was/is the right man at the right time. How easy it is to sit at one's desk and judge. How many times have you had a day/week/vacation planned only to have it totally disrupted or thrown into chaos because of one event you had not forseen. We have both a son and a daughter in Baghdad as I type and I am proud of them and their service. I am proud that they feel a sense of duty and purpose to this country that welcomed their ancestors to it shores so many decades ago. It is a leagacy I pray that will be passed down through their children.
2006-10-17 04:17:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by violet 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Bush should have been impeached by now for muliple lies and abusing the powers of his office. I've already written to my senator asking him to consider it. Have you?
Bush is not as stupid as he appears. He has managed to increase the power of the White House (the executive branch) at the expense of the Supreme Court (the judicial branch) and Congress (the legislative branch). One leg of the tripod is much longer and stronger now. We are moving toward a dictatorship and the only thing that will save us is the two term limit on presidents.
Before you think it can't happen, look at Julius Ceasar and Rome. He undermined the Roman Senate and took more power to himself. If he hadn't been assassinated, he would have been emperor. Instead his nephew completed the job.
Before you think it can't happen, look at HITLER and Germany. Germany had a legislative branch and two weeks before Hitler's election as chancellor, the building burned--and it was blamed on the Jews.
Stay informed as the 2008 election nears. It will determine whether we stay a democracy.
2006-10-17 04:17:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by loryntoo 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well, I dont think so. This administration has proven that the Govt is out of control and corrupt for sure. As if we didnt know it from before. But BUSH and his clique of rich coke head buddies have ruined our nation completely. it will be years before the world EVER trust us, or anything ever again!
2006-10-17 04:20:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by madclowndisease420 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
This is a rhetorical question right?? My 2 1/2 year old speaks better, and makes better decisions than Bush. I am humiliated we have him as our leader. I think that we as Americans can learn from the mistake of voting him into office. Lets start voting for the BEST candidate, rather than trying to be loyal to a certain party.
2006-10-17 04:12:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by sdubsdub 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
No he should not be president, he should be tried for war crimes and at the least he should be impeached. He took it upon himself to declare war without Congress' vote. He is like a little kid playing with big boy toys. Also, for those of you who said we voted, and suck it up, our vote doesnt count for anything anyway, because George Bush declared himself president two times, even after all the funky stuff in Florida and Ohio (Florida where his bro is gov, and Ohio where the gov is his boy and promised him Ohio)
2006-10-17 05:49:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
You guys elected him - unless you want to give up democracy and stage a revolution I suggest that you stick with the guy who got voted in under your electorial rules... and maybe think more carefully about where you put that "X" next time.
Anyone who didn't bother to vote should not be permitted to answer - if you didn't exercise your vote when you had the chance then you really have no cause to complain now.
My personal view is that if you guys elected him then what does that say about the majority of people in the USA? The same goes over here in the UK... look who we're stuck with... that moronic weasle Tony Blair... but some idiot must've voted for him.
2006-10-17 04:04:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
he might as well be. a spineless democrat will become president in 2008 then he will back off pull the troops out then I hope your house is the first one terrorized in the invasion.
2006-10-17 04:09:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋