2006-10-17 02:48:33 · 13 answers · asked by Peacchybabes 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
not in the immediate future, I suspect it will be down to a future Prime Minister to make that call
2006-10-17 02:58:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm.... yes. Maybe he is in for the war, but the majority of brits are severely against war on Iraq. So my guess would be he will pull the british troops out sooner or later, by the publics' strong demands. But due to the current fu*ked up situation in iraq now, the pull out will be delayed for a long time.
2006-10-17 03:05:33 · answer #2 · answered by davegesprek 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rumhead should take a lesson from Blair. Withdraw.
2006-10-17 03:13:28 · answer #3 · answered by Reba K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
america of a and uk will in no way go away thoroughly(because of the fact they could shelter the oil fields they have all yet stolen)america of a would be erecting great militia bases everywhere in the area subsequently. you notice what number bases pop up everywhere in the gulf and in Afghanistan interior the destiny.Iraq is the 1st so noted as circulate interior the petrowars,Iran would be next(the two via covert skill or greater public skill(this circulate would be shielded via asserting Iran needs nukes and we could stop that occuring) In 2005 Iran replaced from advertising oil for funds to euros this might make the dollar even weaker, because it did whilst Saddam did it in 2000(in view that u.s. invaded Iraq and altered the regime, oil in Iraq must be offered in funds lower back)do you notice the place i circulate with this,its no longer a accident is it.various those issues ARE actuality so which you tell ME,IF those ARE data AM I mendacity. this entire warfare is approximately skill, oil ,great funds regen initiatives and maximum heavily who gets administration over the final oil producing international places on earth.Iraq and Iran stands out as the final 2 international places on earth to expire of the black gold in around 116 years time(stats from British petroleum no longer me)
2016-12-26 21:30:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a moot point. He won't have a say for much longer. He's out some time in May '07.
2006-10-17 06:17:55 · answer #5 · answered by Q&A Queen 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, because his head is so far up his own **** he cant see beyond his big house and fat paycheck. he is the most useless, selfish and disgraceful prime minister ever, and i cant wait for him to die a painful death.
2006-10-17 08:26:15 · answer #6 · answered by jimi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look out, there goes another of those flying pigs!!
2006-10-18 01:51:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he finaly sees the light
2006-10-17 10:54:59 · answer #8 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not down to blair anymore as hes leaving now YEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH oh yeh and hes a d!k
2006-10-17 03:47:26 · answer #9 · answered by dirtyharry7717 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
eventually, yes
2006-10-17 03:48:56 · answer #10 · answered by Amanda K 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋