2006-10-17 02:23:21 · 5 answers · asked by bestgoodman 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I was charged with 67 in 55. How can that be accurate if their is no radar gun.
2006-10-17 02:38:56 · update #1
Usually there is. But if you are asking because the Officer didn't show you the radar reading then ....
The Officer is correct per the US Supreme Court Ruling. (Forgotten now but know it is so) an Officer does not have to show the radar.
Best case is to go to a Driver's Improvement Safety Course or pay the ticket.
If you decide to fight the citation. Good Luck. Just becareful when you go into court. If you admit to maybe going 1-2 miles over the posted speed limit then you are toast. Once you have admitted to speeding it is just a matter of record of how fast you were actually going over the posted speed limit. The Officer's Radar Gun has been calibrated within the last year. When was the last time your speedometer was calibrated ??
Good Luck and please slow down.
Side note- Radar Detectors are made by the same company that makes the Police's Radar Guns. Radar Detectors are usually good enough to let you know that you have been clocked on Radar.
2006-10-17 02:37:31 · answer #1 · answered by JohnRingold 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they don't have a radar ticket of how fast your going, you can fight it because they probably wont go to court to pursue it. if they do they have no proof that you were.
2006-10-17 09:31:51 · answer #2 · answered by honey 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeh just them need 2 c u speeding
2006-10-17 09:32:46 · answer #3 · answered by Perth-beachbabe15 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no id challange it ill bet u will win it in court
2006-10-17 09:32:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
just their word of your speeding is enough.
2006-10-17 09:29:55 · answer #5 · answered by shepardman1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋