And a round of applause for Condileeza, our National Security Advisor.
2006-10-17 02:22:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bush has been multi tasking and allowing Haliburton, Carlyle, and Bechtel corps to loot America and Iraq. Bush also used this un-winnable war to change legislature of the Constitution and Bill of Rights with over 250 signing statements now. Wolves in sheep's clothing you know. Vote them all out in November!!!
2006-10-17 02:43:05 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 13⤊ 2⤋
Well, I suppose the left and right enjoy insulting each other, but I don't want to play that game, so here is a real answer.
Anything that any president did, Republican or Democrat, other than surrender and enforce Shira law in the US, would have created more terrorists.
These people hate our way of life. Attacking them will make them hate us more, ignoring them will make them hate us more, giving aid to them would make them resent and hate us more.
Basically, were screwed.
PS: Condi for President!
2006-10-17 09:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by CycloneSteve 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
From having fought in Iraq I would have to agree that out presence in the middle east has helped the recruitment of terrorists more than anything else we could have done. Attacking Afghanistan was one thing, but going after Iraq was just wrong. I have watched pro-American families in Iraq quickly turn on us because of our presence in their country. Anyone who says otherwise is living in a fairytale, Utopian world with the President.
2006-10-17 09:38:13 · answer #3 · answered by camus0281 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As a citizen of Texas with financial interests in the Oil market, why would he NOT invade Iraq while he had troops in the area anyhow?
Along with this, Saddam Hussein made typical arabic threats against George Herbert Walker Bush (His daddy), vowing to kill Daddy. This war is nothing but financial, greed-driven and a personal vendetta for George Walker Bush.
You will notice that during President Clinton's term of office, there were less of these issues.
2006-10-17 09:32:12 · answer #4 · answered by sewmouse 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Have you ever wondered how much terrorism there would be if the media, and people like yourself did not encourage the terrorists? It's a sad day when you people hate the President that much.
2006-10-17 09:49:35 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because 911 and Iraq are both all about winning THIS secret "prize"!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-10-17 15:24:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism is not his concern.His concern is loading his pockets with oil money.He has no intention of leaving Iraq with all that oil there.I feel sorry for all the sacrifices that have been caught up in this bogus war.They were used.
2006-10-17 09:44:46 · answer #7 · answered by Sid 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He's a dill-rod trying to finish daddy's work.Saddam pose no threat to this country in my opinion. He had no ICBMs or even an air force to bring anything over here. WMDs my foot.
2006-10-17 10:01:39 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean by more terrorists in Iraq ? Explain your theory because I am pretty sure that ,is all that it is,is a theory ,right? Because otherwise the question does not make sense.
2006-10-17 09:32:10 · answer #9 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
He CREATED? I thought they voluntered to be terrorists.
2006-10-17 09:34:32 · answer #10 · answered by "I Want to Know Your Answer 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋