can you please elaborate in detail
thank you
2006-10-17 02:08:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It once stood for a free nhs- now where is the free dental treatment, free care in old age and free eyecare?
It used to look after the manual and low paid workers- now it feathers it's own nest and leaves the rest of us to sit on the dole or live on low wages and credit with ever increasing house prices, tax increases and fuel bills.
It used to promote state education- now many of the labour party members come from private/public schools and send their kids to them too.
It used to care about the poor. Now it encourages an underclass.
Now they have wealth and power they do not care about the rest of us. If Dianne Abbot thinks she knows anything about the plight of inner city black kids or john prescott, anything about the northern working class or ken livingston anything about problems in the cities - think again.
Let them get back to their jags, croquet and smart central london homes and offices they keep redecorating at our expense.
It has abandoned just about all of it's principles i'd say.
2006-10-17 02:49:44 · answer #1 · answered by brainlady 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How long have you got and what principles are they supposed to have as New Labour Party.....no principles as far as I can see. And certainly no minister with portfolio that endorses Labour Party Principles.
2006-10-17 02:21:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
labour abandoned all its pricipals when fony tony took over as leader,it is now known as "new labour" which in fact is blair speak for tory.how can he have principals when he is so far up bushes backside he cant see daylight?we really should dispose of this so called labour party as quickly as possible before bush tells them to invade north korea because we all know fony tony will do what bush tells him and the labour party do what blair tells them.....so vote them out first chance we get
2006-10-18 00:37:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never liked the old ones, which were based on envy. The new ones are much worse though, they are now a revolutionary totalitarian party.
2006-10-19 00:06:41 · answer #4 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It had principals? Wow. Who knew?
All governments promise the earth in their manifestos and never deliver once they are elected - they're all a waste of time.
2006-10-17 02:17:55 · answer #5 · answered by Witchywoo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they have any principles to abandon any more
2006-10-17 02:57:14 · answer #6 · answered by mike-from-spain 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They never had any, their sole purpose was to to take the population for a ride and subvert them, which they have succeeded in doing.
2006-10-17 02:19:01 · answer #7 · answered by tucksie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what is the labour party?
2006-10-17 02:18:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
99.99999999999999999 and a bit%
2006-10-17 02:33:28 · answer #9 · answered by manforallseasons 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋