The British police are not routinely armed, except in Northern Ireland, at airports, nuclear facilities, and on some protection duties.
2006-10-17 02:01:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it somewhat relies upon on the position the police is operating. In North u . s . a . of america it is a distinct definite! by using easy get entry to to firearms, maximum criminals can be armed with hearth means and it will be an unwise flow to dispatch officials armed with mere batons. yet having suggested that, increasing the hearth means of the police rigidity does no longer have a lot bring about reducing crime, when you consider that criminals might want to easily hunt down extra effective firearms to verify those of the police. at the same time as each and every area are extra constructive armed, then there'll certainly be extra violence. Over right here in (non conflict-zone) Africa, it is a diverse tale. maximum criminals are petty thieves and pickpockets, and the police casually shoot them lifeless with AK-40 seven's. In some elements of the international, the police are way over-armed and have a tendency to abuse their hearth means. In end, the police might want to in difficulty-free words be armed to an important degree in accordance to the problem of the realm of operation.
2016-12-04 22:13:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋