And don't go whining about Clinton. This happened well into Bush's watch. This is a president who reads books about pet goats when we are under attack.
2006-10-17 01:20:44 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Wanda: Going further it was not just a LACK of intelligence, it was a complete absence of intelligence - going all the way to the White House.
2006-10-17 01:33:33 · update #1
No nor did they protect us from an illegal immigrant coming into America every 30 seconds. They made it real clear how they felt about the poor with New Orleans. There is absolutely not any reason to trust them. Foley and Hastert are another reason, to much to list as failures to America.
2006-10-17 02:48:41 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 12⤊ 3⤋
Why should we trust Democrats? Did they protect us from 9/11?
I am amazed you think there are no Democrats in the White House. If any of them (dems) had tried to prevent 9/11 we would have known about it.
The plot against the WTC was in the works during the Clinton administration. That should give you a clue - that if Bush was not in office at that time..., then it was Clinton who pished a lot of people off -Arabs. And now the only way Bush is pishing them off is by fighting back.
2006-10-17 08:39:54 · answer #2 · answered by Victor ious 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
No and you still aren't protected.
The terrorist hit the U.S. exactly where they wanted to hit this country...in the pocket book.
They also are winning the war because this crisis has turned Americans against each other...Dem vs Rep. This country is so polarized now it's not funny.
They are also winning because the military is getting stretched thin with the different war fronts now.
Iraq,
Afghanistan,
Iran,
N.Korea and who knows who is next...??
The American people are given a false sense of security starting with your local police department.
Do you really think you are being protected by anyone or anything?
2006-10-17 08:29:04 · answer #3 · answered by Gettin_by 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Why? Can't stand the truth? Clinton did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING for eight years, even when he had SEVERAL chances to get Bin Laden. Then he has to have Sandy Berger go STEAL documents from the National Archives, with Clinton's hand written notes about using planes as attack weapons, to cover it up.
I know you don't have the guts to face the truth, but for those who are interested, follow the links below.
2006-10-17 08:41:21 · answer #4 · answered by L96vette 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I know for a fact that Bill Clinton was the one behind that 9/11 attack. Prove otherwise.
It was planned on his watch.
He and the Ds put a wall between the FBI and CIA preventing the information needed to pass from one to the other.
He and the Ds gutted the US human intelligence operations during the 90s.
The training of pilots happened on his watch.
He turned down OBL's capture several times during his administration.
He did practically nothing to Al Qaeda during his watch.
He was either incompetent or in bed with OBL as well as Monica.
2006-10-17 08:30:39 · answer #5 · answered by Da Judge 3 · 7⤊ 4⤋
Speaking of reading books, maybe you should pick up a book on how the US gov't is run. Whether you want to admit to it or not, Clinton was and is part of what happened on 9/11. You cannot possibly say that he did everything in his effort to deter that tragedy.
And last I checked, both democrats and republicans stilll uphold Congress, who btw had the same info that the President had.
2006-10-17 08:28:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 4⤋
The blame SHOULD be put on both and the Intelligence community. Remember on Clinton's watch there was the Cole bombing, the first bombing of the WTC, the Bali bombings, not to mention Bosnia, Somalia, etc.. To say that the Republicans get us into wars would be totally false.
2006-10-17 08:31:43 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Sure it happened on Bush' watch, but it didn't happen overnight. Events which took place, on Clinton's watch, are starting to effect us. It is very idiotic to blame all Republican's, and to think that reading and petting is all the president does.
2006-10-17 08:27:36 · answer #8 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Obviously it was an Intelligence failure, the one allowing the destruction of those towers
2006-10-17 08:27:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
what i find absolutely hilarious is the fact that half the time the dems blame bush for actually planning the attack on 9/11, and the other half believe that he knew about it and allowed the terrorists to do it.. i really wish this party would get their conspiracy theories straight.
yes clinton knew about the threat from al queda.. and yes, it is documented.
i dont think clinton is to blame and i dont believe bush is to lame . who are we to blame anyone for what some radical muslims did. you are all pathetic and anti america.
2006-10-17 08:32:38 · answer #10 · answered by pain_made_me_beautiful 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋