A new theory for the Electoral College?

Question

There is nothing in the Constitution about Electoral Districts, tying each House representative to a particular geography. According to the Constitution:

"The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states."

But it doesn't say HOW they will be chosen. So here is a new theory that will never fly, but I want your opinion.

Instead of goegraphical districts, have the seats chosen by people within a given profession. You could have one representative chosen by all the high-tech workers, one by manufacturing, one by physicians and health care, one by entertainment and travel, one by farmers, etc. The main advantage of this plan is that the population of the House would become a better cross-section of society, abandoning it's 75% Lawyers current representation.

Your thoughts are appreciated.

Answer 1

You're confusing the Electoral College with the House of Representatives. The Supreme Court in the case of Baker v Carr said that House districts are indeed tied to geography, and that each district must be of roughly equal population. So I'm afraid your plan wouldn't fly.

But your idea of representing the professions isn't new. It is the basis of "syndicalism" and was also actually used by Mussolini in the arrangement of Italian Fascism.

Answer 2

i could never heard that one, even though it would not ask your self me that human beings could arise with considered one of those ingredient and believe it, present day human beings have no genuine carry close of their united states's historic past. in ingredient of actuality, the reason the Electoral college exists is by using verbal replace issues that existed in 1789. whilst the quickest ability of interstate verbal replace become by utilising horse or deliver a right away election could have taken months. by utilising allowing direct election of the electors, and then permitting them to fulfill and debate on their components behalf, that concern become solved. the unique concept, as proposed by utilising James Madison's Virginia Plan, become to enable the Congress choose for the President without enter from the inhabitants, subsequently with the intention that the President could consistently come from the social gathering with the Legislative Majority. The Electoral college become area of the super Compromise brokered by utilising Roger Sherman to maintain the administrative branch thoroughly autonomous of the Legislative branch. many human beings sense, given the advancements in present day communications, that it quite is previous time to re-bypass to the question of no count if the Electoral college remains required, yet that's a separate question.

Answer 3

It would give too much influence to an industry, and more lobbying firms and unions could be started for the sole purpose of presuming, which some due, to speak for the majority.

Two, some sectors are weaker than others, so diverse sectors would have competition that may be repressive to smaller sectors therein.

A representative needs diverse obligations or he risks acting against the needs of those not directly covered by his mandate.

Answer 4

You must be kidding? That proposal is so absurd. You'd like to have the "haves" preside over our government, when they already do!

The Republicans must put forth better candidates, and no lawyers amongst them. I am also tired of Republican lawyers!

Answer 5

well, dont we normally select people from various fields to be in the house anyway?

maybe its cause im from west virginia, but our congressman worked for the telephone company and our senator was a coal miner, neither have a lawyers experience....

Answer 6

All the lawyers will claim to be something else. We still get stuck with lawyers.

Answer 7

I think we should just leave it up to the blue-haired bingo-set in Florida like 2000.

Answer 8

yeah, right, i agree!
i think there should be at least one janitor and one cab driver or delivery (pizza) guy in the senate!