English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I loved the first one cause it was more bloodier and the storyline still carried out great(it shows that not all bloody, violent movies are brainless) but the second was dissapointing, IMO. The way Bill died was lame-o! :P

2006-10-16 16:42:11 · 26 answers · asked by JM 1 in Entertainment & Music Movies

26 answers

KB#1, left you wanting more, #2 is not what you wanted.

2006-10-16 16:50:54 · answer #1 · answered by JoeJOE 3 · 1 0

1

2016-05-22 08:04:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Kill Bill 1 was awesome. You're right. My biggest criticism of Kill Bill 2, and the reason I really disliked it so, is that the story doesn't carry as well as Kill Bill 1. Yeah, as someone already mentioned, it IS technically the same story, just progressed to settle everything. Much like a television series (can't wait for The Sopranos, BTW - had to throw that out there). But, comparatively, it was presented much better, better dialouge, better forward-moving pace...just better showcase in Vol. 1 than Vol. 2.

They're both great films done by a great filmmaker. But if I were given the choice to watch either over and over again, I'd definitely choose the first. Never mind the action, I liked the story...and Lucy Lui is INCREDIBLY HOT!!!

2006-10-16 18:35:07 · answer #3 · answered by LifeTaughtLessons 2 · 0 0

1 and 2 are the same story. The first had more action the second was more dramatic. I liked both parts. I will say the way Bill dies is dissapointing. I was waiting for this hugh showdown. But Tarantino is good at being unpredictable as a film maker.

2006-10-16 16:49:37 · answer #4 · answered by ahauntedhistory 3 · 0 0

Action in 1 storyline in 2

2006-10-16 16:46:17 · answer #5 · answered by aaron g 3 · 0 0

Definitely 1

2006-10-16 16:44:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I thought Part 2 was far superior to Part 1. I get sick and tired of Tarrantino's "hey, look how CLEVER i am!" directing methods, and, in Part 2, he actually slowed the pace long enough for me to appreciate the dialogue and the quality of the performances. One of these days, I'll watch the whole thing at once, and see how they fit together as a single filmgoing experience.

2006-10-17 02:41:35 · answer #7 · answered by shkspr 6 · 0 0

Kill Bill: Vol. 1

2006-10-17 01:16:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Kill bill 1 was the best so I thought

2006-10-16 17:12:56 · answer #9 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0 0

well, from what i understood, 1 & 2 were filmed to be released as one movie but it was too long so the split it up.

i loved them both. bloody killing is awesome, but part 2 explained everything that part 1 should have.

2006-10-16 16:45:52 · answer #10 · answered by Jer 3 · 0 0

Both... The idea was that it was meant to be one movie... Vol 1 asked the questions and vol 2 answered them. Personally I believe Tarantino to be an eccentric genius the way he directs his films.

2006-10-17 02:46:35 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers