the answers. The answers people post are 90% opinion and 10% manipulated facts. Here are the facts:
WASHINGTON — The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said .http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
Consider these shocking facts:
• Found: 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
• Found: 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons
• Found: Roadside bomb loaded with sarin gas
• Found: 1,000 radioactive materials--ideal for radioactive dirty bombs
• Found: 17 chemical warheads--some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin
http://www.humanevents.com/sarticle.php?id=10101
I think those facts cover the Iraq portion of Bush
Tell me people, what is it that you disagree with? Or is it that you are just a bit mad that the Republicans are ruling every branch of government?
2006-10-16 16:35:05 · 15 answers · asked by chris 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You have to pay a price for Homeland Security.
2006-10-16 16:39:23 · update #1
Pay attention to the news??? Are you serious?? That is the most ridiculous way of getting the facts I've ever heard of!
2006-10-16 16:40:39 · update #2
Not me, You did not seem to get the question, I wanted straight facts of why people don't like Bush, you gave me a link that tells me that we went to Iraq only to find weapons that aren't AS destructive as we hoped to have found.
2006-10-16 16:44:09 · update #3
One more thing, people say that Bush was too slow in Katrina. Well what do you expect? If a flood hits your city, you actually, realistically expect the government to land a helicopter on your roof within 24 hours to deliver youa bottle of water??? In a city the size of New Orleans (1,337,726, thats just the city limits), it is tough to deliver every single person first aid and rescue within the time period you people expect. GET REAL!!!
2006-10-16 16:52:12 · update #4
Defense Dept disavows Santorums claims;
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/21/dod-disavows-santorum/
No WMD's. Face it, get over it, live with it.
2006-10-16 16:41:30 · answer #1 · answered by notme 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Obviously, your mind is made up and despite your question, you are intent on believing what you want in spite of the facts.
For example: You wrote in a response above, "Pay attention to the news??? Are you serious?? That is the most ridiculous way of getting the facts I've ever heard of!"
And yet the source you gave for your "facts" was Fox News, a severely biased, consistently inaccurate conservative mouthpiece that is often called "Faux News" for good reason.
It is no coincidence that Bush tapped a FOX News "reporter" as his new Press Secretary.
There are many on both sides, conservative and liberal, Republican and Democrat, whose opinions for whatever reason (unfortunately including religion) are set in concrete and cannot be changed by facts. I would urge you and every American to objectively look at the FACTS, get your information from sources other than Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, and other pseudo-news sources.
Remember, this is SERIOUS BUSINESS, not an excuse to argue. It is the FUTURE OF OUR NATION we are talking about. Regardless of which "side" you are on, we are all Americans and should all be working together to secure the future of our country and the world. This is one of the major failings of the Bush administration: Polarizing Americans rather than bringing them together, even after one of the worst national disasters in our history brought us all together.
I urge EVERYONE to do your homework, be open minded, and listen to what the other side has to say before making up your mind.
God Save America...
2006-10-17 00:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by Don P 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey notme, he did not discredit it, he just said they are not the same ones they went to war, the ones that found on intelligence. Did you even realize you contradicted your entire belief on the Iraq war? Probably not.
EDIT: I will elaborate on what I meant
Bush says WMD's for the reason to go to Iraq
notme says no WMD's but some other reason to go to Iraq
Article(1) says WMD's found
notme has an article(2) that says the ones they went to war for, were not found in what the article(1) says were found
notme uses this as a source, article(2), which still implies war in Iraq was for WMD's, but not found yet.
notme contradicts his/her belief on why Bush went to war with Iraq, by providing an article that said the current WMD's found were not the ones they went to war for
Understand?
2006-10-16 23:45:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush is a warmonger. He cares only about waging wars and nothing else. Why do you think he took forever to take actions during Katrina?
His policy of amending the constitution is bull. I don't care if he's the president, you can't just amend the constitution for your own personal gains.
He wants to legalize torture which I think brings down the morals of the people in this country. We're supposed to be God-fearing people, or so, Bush said so, but his words and actions says something different.
Update: You asked a question and I answered and you gave me a negative? Wow, so much for answering your question honestly.
2006-10-16 23:44:26 · answer #4 · answered by Tiny 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Actualy they founnd this;
1.77 metric tons of sugar
1500 gallons of grape juice
roadside lorries loaded with dates
100,000 widowed women and
100,000 orphans childs
2006-10-17 00:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by joe5997 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
People like to blame all the worldly problems on the administration even if they have no power over it. I agree, most people are making stuff up just to disagree. I just say a post claiming Bush was controlling gas prices. Enough said.
And yep I get thumbs down for stating the truth. Congrats on ignorance...
2006-10-16 23:38:53 · answer #6 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Just one flaw Bush said no wmd in Iraq.
2006-10-16 23:44:40 · answer #7 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
people have that right. unfortionatly sometimes it is based on opinion or misguided thoughts. a person can be completely wrong but if they think they are right then they are. if they can get some others to believe them then it continues. i see tons of answers in here that are wrong but if that person asking thinks it's right then by god it must be. i am not always right, but i don't answer questions unless i know i am on those questions that are specific. if it is like this one, then i just put what i think just like everyone else is going to. just be prepared to get slammed. most people in hear are full of hate.
2006-10-16 23:43:09 · answer #8 · answered by Steve B 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm thankful he is our President. I sure don't hate him and neither does anyone else I know personally. No person or party is perfect and the things they have to deal with would be overwhelming each day.
2006-10-16 23:54:32 · answer #9 · answered by 4263 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The ones we didn't find are in Syria. The simple minded left can only think about Bush hatred. They don't care what they are doing to the country by giving comfort to the enemy . They could care less about America.
2006-10-16 23:41:34 · answer #10 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋