The examples are numerous, the most frightening examples is flight 93 where they reported it crashed in Pennsylvania but if you look at the photos there is no plane debris at the crash site. The plane touched down safely in Cleveland, Ohio.
2006-10-16 15:50:34 · 7 answers · asked by metalsoft@sbcglobal.net 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I love you ignorant conspiracy types. The conspiracy is that there was no conspiracy. Plus eveyone knows the flight was shot down. the engine was found a mile away from the crash scene... behind the crash scene.
You guys are so niave, but think you are so damn smart. That is why the conspiracy theory is so funny, it is the conspiracy itself that is a false flag operation.
2006-10-16 15:58:42 · answer #1 · answered by Jester 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is possible to sue a TV network for spreading false news. I also believe that principle should be used on Internet communications.
Your claim that flight 93 reached the ground safely in Cleveland, is ridiculous. There are dead people! There were good, patriotic people that forced that plane down, short of its target. They were heroes, and you spread false information that they weren't!
You are a sick individual, and you need help! I do hope that the law will extend to you sick people, publishing false information on the Internet! You disgrace our nation, and the sons and daughters that served us so well!
2006-10-16 16:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
So they deliberatly took pictures of an empty field? That makes a lot of sense. If it was really a conspiracy don't you think it would be easier to just crash a plane and take pictures of it? It would be easy to do, just get the pilot to parachute out bfore th crash.
2006-10-16 15:54:26 · answer #3 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't Fox information Channel. It replaced right into a community Fox community associate in Florida. we are conversing in regards to the community of Homer Simpson, no longer the community of bill O'Reilly. it isn't the comparable employer she replaced into suing, it isn't the comparable editorial board, it isn't the comparable administration. And the appellate courtroom made the ideal decision. it is not a criminal offense to lie. that's a civil tort sometimes, in spite of the undeniable fact that it is not a criminal offense, and consequently the whistleblower provisions of state regulation do no longer come into play. that's often stated via people who have not truly study the case as being approximately Fox information Channel. yet now you recognize greater constructive.
2016-12-26 21:17:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sue for what? Don't be unrational. The only way you can sue is if they reported a lie about you. I am from Cleveland too.
2006-10-16 16:00:02 · answer #5 · answered by devora k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont think so....freedom of speech/press
2006-10-16 15:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by super hombre 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL, What a story!
2006-10-16 15:53:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋