English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"WASHINGTON - U.S. spy agencies confirmed North Korea's nuclear test on Monday, even as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice declared that U.N. sanctions prove the world is united in opposing Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions."

She will visit Japan, South Korea, China and Russia.
Why? aren't they all united? Aren't the sanctions in place?

2006-10-16 15:22:22 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

3 answers

Sanctions may be in place, but lets face facts here. The USA is one of the most hated countries in the world to most everybody except themselves.

This trip is to try and stop China, Japan, Russia and South Korea from backing down and letting North Korea from easily getting a bomb to the USA. I would not be surprised if on this trip the USA had to offer goods and services in exchange for surport.

The world may be strongly against North Korea's Nuclear program, but as usual the USA is forcing its hand and hurting talks. Here is an idea, use the CIA and Navy Seals to hunt down Kim and kill him. Steal the Nukes, and then return the financially crippled North Korea to the wealthy South Korean government thus ending a long standing war, and with the help of its closest neighbours Russia, China, Japan and Australia (Not the USA) lets rebuild this nation.

From North Korea right now, they could nuke Alaska - a barren wasteland. A good chunk of China could go along with Russia - But why attack countries with nukes when preasure could be applied to Japan who only has the SSDF or Australia (even though a direct hit from North Korea could only kill 1% of the entire Australian population - the rest is out of range by the better part of 600Km. Killing the friends of the USA is a easier and better idea then hitting the USA itself.

The worst thing is that this is all because of George W Bush and his war on terror. If he wasn't so stupid as to name countries in his declarations against terrorism, and just name groups of people, this could have all been avoided.

I blame the USA. I think Ms Rice is one of the best things to happen to the USA, and she may be able to defuse the situation, but you can bet that it won't be until blood is shed at the hands of the USA - They love war.

Forgive my being rude or offending anybody. This is my opinion and although it is may be wrong according to you, it is how I see it.

2006-10-16 15:56:07 · answer #1 · answered by shauny2807 3 · 1 0

you're very ideal. no you could blame Jenna for the Iraq warfare. She isn't the single that sat interior the seat and voted to circulate forward w/ it. truthfully everyone seems to be basically being ignorant! and you're very ideal, Chelsea replaced into skipped over of her fathers controversy. Jenna has her very own life and that has no longer something to do w/ her father and congress vote casting to circulate to warfare! human beings basically p.c. to make a huge deal approximately no longer something those days!

2016-12-26 21:15:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

both rice and bush should stop talking htey are becomming the laughingstok of the world

2006-10-17 11:17:44 · answer #3 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers