Eight years of relentless, vitriolic, hysterical, occasionally obscene attacks on a president’s wife: moral. Mention of the well-known sexual orientation of a vice president’s daughter: immoral. Explain?
2006-10-16 14:49:14 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm not talking about Laura Bush, she hasn't been in the White House for 8 years. We are talkning about Hilary here.
2006-10-16 14:53:34 · update #1
I'm going to leave this one up for the users to vote for best answer.
Thanks everyone!
2006-10-17 14:53:52 · update #2
Don't forget Limbaugh's "The White House has a new dog" comment when showing a picture of Chelsea. But since her father was a Democrat, its ok to say things like that about children.
2006-10-16 14:52:59 · answer #1 · answered by Skippy 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I can't believe you don't see the difference between a high profile, outspoken, feminist attorney and a young, nieve girl who is completely accessory to the Vice President's political career.
Bill and Hillary were a team (still are). You can't say the same for Cheney and his daughter in the same political sense.
If you want to compare Al Gore's daughter and Cheney's daughter, that might be fair.
2006-10-16 15:20:34 · answer #2 · answered by Andrew 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lack of non secular beliefs or affiliations and shortage of morals are in no way a similar element; nor might want to all of us be so ignorant as to change into attentive to them as such. you receives truly some that....really from Christians; yet that doesn't make it accurate; in any respect. As a Wiccan, lots of the most compassionate, type-hearted, moral human beings i have met were Atheists; and not in any respect in difficulty-free words that...yet they have been advantageous with the diversities in our beliefs. i have not in any respect once had an Atheist threaten me, insult me, or end being acquaintances with me because i'm Wiccan or because I help gay rights, for that count number. magnificent advantages.
2016-12-04 22:01:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, morals is an easier topic to speak about than type about, here are some strong examples of morals...
http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=irishdictator
2006-10-17 13:47:36 · answer #4 · answered by SlapADog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Repuglicans don't you just love em, too dumb to understand a simple question, sure they attacked Hillary, they still do. But do not say anything about Bush and Condi might be getting it on. They will call you all sorts of things not in the countrys best interest.
2006-10-16 14:57:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I care about issues not sexual orientation.
Discuss solutions and stop personal attacks. It appears that you have a problem with a lesbian republican vice president's daughter that never ran for office.
2006-10-16 14:54:09 · answer #6 · answered by graywi123 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hillary's problems were self inflicted (white water/ nationalized health insurance) while Cheney's daughter's orientation is beyond her control.
2006-10-16 14:52:36 · answer #7 · answered by Brand X 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What the hell are you talking about... no one cares about Cheney's Daughter's sexual orientation and everyone likes Laura Bush...
2006-10-16 14:52:04 · answer #8 · answered by i_love_my_mp 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋