English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-16 14:48:40 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Corporations

All very interesting, but I have to say I'm leaning toward *sunshine25* because she has mastered the earnings reports chronology. All I ask in return for '11' points (10>BEST ANSWER + 1>for VOTING your conscience) is that you go to my answer tab and break the darn tie on the 7th question down about "how long cooked potatoes last"...you won't believe what some people vote for. THANKS !!!

2006-10-16 16:39:35 · update #1

SHORT-CUT FOR ABOVE TIE-BREAKER:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsyQh0sIWRKP3IdW6vE6Gkvsy6IX?qid=20061010065745AArTJq1

2006-10-17 04:05:08 · update #2

5 answers

A better read will be Tues (Oct. 17) after Intel and YHOO! report earnings for the fiscal 3rd quarter. Lower share price equals lower market caps. Most anything is possible in acquisitions, take-overs and mergers. The Google acquisition of YouTube was an all-stock deal. Likely Facebook will soon be in play. Some of the major players in speculation of any valuable Internet acquisition is Microsoft, Newscorp (MySpace) and Viacom (MTV).

2006-10-16 15:47:21 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 1 0

Probably not. They would first have to have some tangible assets and they do not. Secondly a short study of what they call "ad revenues" includes those that are traded from one site to another. So if Pepsi buys an ad that is listed at say $500,000, but Pepsi only pays $1000.00 for the ad the higher number is listed under ad revenues then deducted later as an expense. In other words reported revenues are grossly exaggerated and anyone who had the knowledge would not consider trying to take over a company that isn't really worth anything. By "worth" I mean properties that can be sold on any market where the parts together have more value than the sum, but each individual part would have to have some unique value, that would be worth anything at all when broken down.

2006-10-16 15:00:07 · answer #2 · answered by Yahoo 6 · 0 0

interior the quick term Yahoo will reject the bid because of the fact the inventory is at a low ingredient and 40 4 billion isn't adequate. Yahoo purchasers will bypass away Yahoo in droves if Microsoft tries to imprint its buggy customer heavy kit on Yahoo's computers. the appropriate case situation is that Microsoft could contain some style of information superhighway based Microsoft place of work into the MicroHoo internet site. the only concern with that's that i'm optimistic Microsoft investors are sitting around saying why can we could desire to consistently purchase Yahoo to try this? we are able to do it without Yahoo and not spend 40 4 billion. i'm additionally uncertain why Microsoft could spend 40 4 billion to become the #2 seek engine...

2016-11-23 15:24:34 · answer #3 · answered by leasure 4 · 0 0

they all are a takeover: myspace, google, youtube, AOL

2006-10-16 14:52:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

YES!

2006-10-16 16:02:54 · answer #5 · answered by worldwise1 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers