2006-10-16 14:37:19 · 17 answers · asked by srk's # one fan! 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Frankly, I liked Kal Ho Naa Ho more. I thought KANK was quite good too but there were a few shortcomings there. KANK was for a mature audience while KHNH could be watched by one and all. That's why, I certainly don't agree that "KANK SUX" but I do believe KHNH was a bit better.
2006-10-17 06:12:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kal Ho Na Ho is better movie as compared to Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna
2006-10-16 15:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by beautiful 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course kal ho na ho because in kabhi alvida na kehna karan johar presented while in kal ho na ho there is a nice story and
a slow movie which the audience like
2006-10-17 05:29:27 · answer #3 · answered by apurva o 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kal Ho NA Ho
2006-10-18 00:05:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kal ho na ho
2006-10-16 15:24:23 · answer #5 · answered by Truth ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kabhi Alvida Kehna Ho Ya Na Ho is better.
Why?
wait until K-K-K-Karan Johar makes it. You'll know why.
2006-10-19 22:03:30 · answer #6 · answered by GAWD 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kal Ho Na Ho was really better then kank.
2006-10-16 17:36:41 · answer #7 · answered by HIMANI 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is upto indivisuals choice to assess.
I like Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna.
2006-10-16 15:18:17 · answer #8 · answered by kingofuniverse 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
kal ho na ho.
cuz it was just great and Khabi alvida nah kehna was just fake that doesnt even happen in life..much does it
2006-10-17 05:29:36 · answer #9 · answered by NEHA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kal ho ho na ho
2006-10-17 16:37:38 · answer #10 · answered by rajan naidu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋