Do you think scientists are smart enough to find "The Theory of Everything" or are they missing the point.

Question

What's the point of looking for something you can't prove, like telepathy. Even if it exists, it's nature is beyond our faculty of comprehension. If you think you know the theory of everything, well what is it or likely to be?

aka Antony K
I suspect you know more about the subject that me, but limited in your ablity to express yourself properly. Your not stupid..just sad.

Answer 1

We will almost certainly develop a T.O.E., and it may happen in your lifetime. However, this is just basically trying to unite the four known forces of nature into a common theoretical framework.

We are just trying to figure out the rules for playing nature's game of chess. Once we know the rules, the real problem starts.. namely how to effectively play the game.

Answer 2

Seems to me the whole point of trying to find the answers to some things that may seem almost impossible is just that - trying to find the answer - not succeeding as such. Think of when you read a really good book and you reach the end, or when you finally complete a great, and pretty difficult, computer game...there's a feeling of emptiness, depression even, as we want it to continue, we don't know what to do next. In many cases, the act of searching and trying is better than the end to the means.

Answer 3

It would not quite do a exceptional purchase. Evolution is actuality. the quantity of information for evolution is *huge* and previous dispute. that's in simple terms one greater small piece. icecreamman_2 - "why cant this be yet another style of monkey?" It *is* yet another style of monkey. So are we (ape, to be technical). Addendum: D S - "the only thank you to coach evolution to me is to coach me the evolutionary technique. be conscious a monkey becoming to be a human in the past my own eyes (not gonna ensue). of direction if it does, then that throws out any ethical policies I even have and that i bypass on a killing spree (haha)." mutually because it quite is unhappy which you have not any concept what evolution is or the way it quite works, what's sadder by utilising an order of importance is seeing considered one of those thoroughly immoral guy or woman as your self. If the only reason you do not bypass around killing human beings is by using the fact your god instructed you to not, do humanity a favour and in simple terms rid the international of your presence top now.

Answer 4

the scientists are looking, but its in the wrong place. we lok outwards for answers, when in fact they lie much closer to home.

one man says it is, another says it isnt, and we argue, for points on an academic scoreboard. and we always miss the point, its too wrapped up in religion and politics...the problem of finding the theory of everything is you have to have some idea where to start... when we stop squabbling and turn our swords into ploughshares...then we may have an opportunity.

ps, i think darwin was wrong, very wrong... and for 200 years weve believed a lie... not a black conspiratorial lie, just a simple mistake kind of lie... only it has far more ramifications than any conspiracy theory....

and the possibility to either unite the world, or destroy it as we know it...

Answer 5

None of the above. They will never find the 'Theory of Everything', but they will learn a lot from the effort.

Answer 6

Good Question, know idea,
I`ve got a theory on dinosaurs though,
their small at one end, much fatter in the middle and small again at the other end.

Answer 7

Theories are only based on repeated testing of hypothesis, and they are not proven. When they are proven they become scientific law, which is a concise statement.

Answer 8

If it's a THEORY - it isn't proven. If it's a LAW it is.

Answer 9

you rway to stupid to be thinking abvout that