some months back did Pres. Bush say that he believed that there was about 100,000 dead Iraqis? I'm not claiming he did...I am looking for a source...but if he did and now is saying 30,000, I would have to say he would be telling a bald faced lie, with full intent. If there is no quote, Bush supporters have my apology.
2006-10-16 13:01:00 · 9 answers · asked by Ford Prefect 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
to "Proud American" I really don't care what you think of me and it's quite possible that you are just as foolish to me...I'm looking for facts numknuts.
2006-10-16 13:09:57 · update #1
in my part of the country we say bald faced lie
2006-10-16 16:39:11 · update #2
The minute I heard the figure of 100k I thought to myself--"In our name he's killed how many...." Apart from being absolutely disgusted I thought the estimate seemed low, taking into the account all the bombing and the inability of our "free press" to do accurate reporting. I always assumed that the figure was higher--much higher. Then you have an independant, non-partisan group like Johns Hopkins publish it's findings and they are immediately discredited by Bush and his supporters. Why would they lie? They said that if anything--their estimates are a low-ball figure!!! Bush is already a proven liar--amazing how another issue pops up that he just can't get his head out of the sand long enough to see!!
2006-10-16 13:28:07 · answer #1 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My buddy, human beings do not care, seem at that scumbag who in basic terms blamed the archives solid. i'm particular he's a numbed out Fox information worshiper. American as an finished do not care, because maximum individuals are fat, lazy, egomaniacs, numbed out in the front of the television. it truly is why Fox information makes use of sound bites, those loser can't seem up data on their personal.
2016-12-04 21:55:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those in the know for a credible toll of the Iraqis who died are not talking to any outside sources. In other words, it's for the government to know and it's none of our affairs.
2006-10-16 13:14:38 · answer #3 · answered by mac 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And chicago averages between 400-500 murders alone each year so your point is?And all that your dribble does is cause our military to lose their moral.Again undermining our soldiers.,keep up the good work.The majority of the soldiers want to be there and they see the death everyday..,its a shame they have the stomach for it continue to want to fight for the cause but you cant support them because you dont support defeating the terrorists..thank god we have true heros as maybe you can learn a lesson from them what a REAL AMERICAN IS.
2006-10-16 13:14:14 · answer #4 · answered by halfbright 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
655,000 dead Iraqi from an credible source, far cry at any rate from the count the moron in the white house give. His lies are not even good lies, he has been caught in more of them then any other politician anywhere in the world.
2006-10-16 13:09:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
bush lies ,your death numbers are 650,000 at least,may they rest in peace ,knowing bush will rote in hell and also be in the mad cow fields soon. it will be 100,000 soon .look at these stupid **** answers,what kind of morons support bush at this point,poor dumb bastards.bush and his people lie,you wont get the facts from them on anything..
2006-10-16 13:17:43 · answer #6 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, there will be casualties when there is a War, that is just how it is..
And you are only speculating, you have no solid proof to your allegations, which only makes you look foolish.
2006-10-16 13:04:45 · answer #7 · answered by Humor me.. 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Lol! Does that include the insurgence?
We need more! And that's 'bold' face lie. Please read more.
2006-10-16 13:04:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
flip-flop,flip-flop!!!
2006-10-16 13:04:02 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋