English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

No, it wasn't. But if I went into great details about WHY I'm of that opinion, I'd probably get arrested. ;)

2006-10-16 13:02:13 · answer #1 · answered by L-Train 4 · 0 1

sure it became. Origionally we've been purely suspose to get commerce on the Port of latest Orleans for $10 million. interior the tip we've been given commerce with the port alongside with a crew of land that extra advantageous than doubled our u . s .'s land length for $15 million ( that makes land became offered at 3 cents an acre). the clarification we've been given all the land from Napoleon became because of the fact he did no longer want the British to take the land considering France and super Britian have been presently at conflict. additionally, with this purchase Napoleon became waiting to get alot of money so he ought to furnish weapons to his infantrymen. If via twist of fate super Britain seized this land from France there might have been a important possiblity that the U. S. and super Britian might have fought yet another conflict quickly after and the U. S. might have been not extra. the U. S. might perpetually be trapped via super Britian on the east and the west and It definately would not be as rich because it presently is at present.

2016-12-16 08:50:17 · answer #2 · answered by idaline 4 · 0 0

Yes and no. Yes because it expanded the size of the United States. No because it exploited the Native American People and their use of the land.

2006-10-18 12:28:34 · answer #3 · answered by kc_warpaint 5 · 0 0

yes

2006-10-18 13:51:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes...becuase we doubled the u.s. for a really good price

2006-10-16 12:56:12 · answer #5 · answered by sjp 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers