They have to be living/seving as princes in medieval times.
2006-10-16 12:50:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Edward of Caernarfon (1284 - 1327), first Prince of Wales after the title was recreated. He became Edward II (of the horrible death).
Edward, Prince of Wales, the Black Prince (1330 - 1376) (never ruled, as he died before his father, Edward III)
Prince Henry (Hal, of Shakespeare's "Henry IV pts I and II), who became Henry V (1387-31-1422)
You've mentioned one of the princes in the Tower, Prince Edward and his brother.
I'll post again if I think of any more.
2006-10-17 01:50:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Precise question. What countries are concerned (or the whole of Europe)? Does "prince" means specifically that the individual must have been important/famous/notorious as a prince, that is before (or without) ever ascending the throne?
Before I know better, the only entry I can make for English culture people would be Edward of Woodstock, aka the Black Prince, the son of Edward III who led English forces through the first part of the 100 year war.
2006-10-17 03:51:34 · answer #2 · answered by Svartalf 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about Richard the Lionheart's evil brother, Prince John? Later, King John... signed the Magna Carta and all that...
2006-10-20 03:03:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prince Philip the 2nd of Spain.
2006-10-17 06:11:17 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Edward, Prince of Wales - Vlad Dracula - Rory Emerald
2006-10-18 02:24:38 · answer #5 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I did see a clip on the small screen television. From what I observed he had to section the canines who have been going to break one yet another, and that i think of consistent with hazard if he had used his arms he could have misplaced some arms. those are gun canines after all. no longer your regularly used family contributors puppy. they did no longer practice lots so i could desire to have ignored the thrashing section. although you could % some responses from farmers and such like, who comprehend extra desirable than something persons approximately this. i'm no longer an recommend of attempting to locate excitement, yet i comprehend some human beings subsidise their lives with creatures they have hunted e.g. fishing, rabbit snares, pheasant shooting. it is an exciting debate to regardless of if we could desire to constantly be closer to the land to stop mass farming cruelty, the place animals have low high quality of existence and little normality. If we do away completely with u . s . a . peoples pastimes will we additionally pass faraway from the land lots that we no longer look on animals as creatures yet basically products.
2016-10-19 12:44:12 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Frederick I(Barbarossa)
Richard I (The Lionheart)
William of Normandy
2006-10-19 21:18:50 · answer #7 · answered by It's Me! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prince Rory Emerald.
Great question!
2006-10-16 15:52:34 · answer #8 · answered by snowy dragon 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
there is no such thing as a prince with a number,that is only for kings and queens
2006-10-17 11:18:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I can give you king names.
- There was William the Conquerer
- Richard the Lionheart
- King John
- Charlamagne
2006-10-16 13:42:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋