Every 9/11 hijacker was Saudi Arabian, Saudi Arabia has an absolute monarchy, not a democracy, a terrible?

Question

human rights policy, and still abuses women. Bin Ladden still funnels money through Saudi banks, why haven't we put our military boots up their butts? By allowing them to attack us during 911 and doing nothing aren't we sending mixed messages to the countries of the middle east?

Answer 1

Because the Saudi's have bought themselves a presiddent and a political party or two!

Answer 2

Wow, what a great statement! Yes Mr. Howard...Many Americans don't realize that Saudi Arabia is a terrorist country. They sponsor Islamic extremist all over the world all the time. They funded Al-Qaida for many years and other international terrorists. Bush knows that, but he tends to ignore it. Did you also know that Saudi Arabia Security was one of the main reasons why Bush invaded Iraq? Yes, Saddam was not a threat to the USA (Iraq too far). Saddam was a big threat to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Saddam wanted for years to occupy both countries, but was waiting for the appropriate time. Of course, controlling the Oil in the Mideast, controlling the European Union closely, controlling the US Dollar against the Euro, protecting Israel, establishing an American base were also part of Bush's Agenda to invade Iraq. However, thinking of the fact that our brave troops are dying daily in Iraq, just to protect a fanatic, theocratic and terrorist nation as Saudi Arabia MAKES me really SICK. Yes, Bush is sending mixed messages to the Mideast countries, especially when he claims that he is in Iraq to establish a democracy. Oh Really Bush? what about Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Arab Countries? Are u going to shove democracy in their throat too? mmmm I wonder!

Answer 3

i could have carried out issues otherwise if i could been Bush. As you pronounced maximum (15) of the nineteen hijackers have been Saudis. the relax 4 have been Egyptians. the two are international locations supposedly friendly to the U. S.. If i could been Bush, i could have rolled up Saudi Arabia like an previous rug. that would have sent a stable message. it could have delivered the secular Muslims like Saddam appropriate decrease back to our edge. He became our best pal as quickly as in the previous interior the 1980's, and could have been back if it served his objective. The S.O.B. became no longer something if no longer a survivor. we would even have had a preserve on the Muslim radicals. Taking Saudi could have given us administration over the two holiest Muslim web content, Mecca and Medina, the two one in all which shall we've blasted off the face of the earth as payback for 9/11. enable's see if those creeps can stay to tell the story 2,0000 years devoid of their temple like the Jews have. i does no longer wager on it, could you?

Answer 4

Because Saudi Arabia pays the Bush family's salary.

Answer 5

5 hijackers are proven to still be alive. It is not even proven that there were hijackers on the plane. Bin Laden is a CIA asset or at least was.

Answer 6

Another reason why the American people must choose other people for the job this coming "mid-term" election. Then, in two years, we should all write in Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert on the ballot for the Presidency.

Answer 7

By using democracy to elect a corrupt idiot like Bush, what kind of message do you think we sent to the world about the greatness of "democracy"?

Channel the movie Chicken Little and yell, "Runnnnn!"

Answer 8

Isn't it funny that at least half of the supposed hijackers are still alive? Personally, I think we're being fed a line of B.S. a mile long.

Answer 9

iam pretty sure it was the tailban in afganstan no wait it was saddam in iraq no no it might be the north koreans.can some one please buy bush a map!

Answer 10

They maybe our Allie, But that does not mean that they have to like us............................