English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am working on a project and it has been a while since I took stats. I am comparing drop out and retention rates among a particular group of students, before and after the implementation of new lesson plans/curriculum, to determine if the new curriculum made a difference. I'm supposed to use a two-tailed test since I don't know which direction the results will go in, right? (Obvioulsy I don't know for sure!) Also would I be using a z-test, t-test, chi square! I just don't remember anything about this and it's not my expertise!

2006-10-16 10:20:39 · 1 answers · asked by MorningStar 2 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

So the null hypothesis is that implementation fo the new curriculum will not make a difference in the two groups. I will not reject the null hypothesis unless the difference in favor of the new curriculum is so big that it would have only a small chance due to sampling variation. Is this right? If so I guess I should use a one-tailed test???

2006-10-16 10:27:40 · update #1

1 answers

You are on the right track:

Ho = The new curriculum doesn't make a difference.

H1 = The curriculum will make a difference.

This leads to a two-sided test because your difference could be positive or negative...tail on either side.

Regards,

Mysstere

2006-10-17 06:30:27 · answer #1 · answered by mysstere 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers