English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was it because there was a compromise between the government and the teacher's union that was mutually beneficial? Or was it magic? SHould those teachers have taken a larger than agreed on pay cut, or was it justified to use their union to fight unfair labor practices?

2006-10-16 08:17:39 · 9 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

The teacher's agreed by a 3 to 1 ratio to accept a three-year deal as reported by cnn.com-Oct.8th. Teachers have had and continue to have perfect reasoning for striking in Detroit. During their last contract the Superintendent enacted a mandatory paycut of 5% to all teachers with the promise of reimbursement during this last contract. Instead he turned around and gave pay raises to principals and administrators, allowed the District's principals to plan, pay for, and attend seminars that were nothing more than hoity toity weekend getaways. They also used some of the monies in the general fund to update their offices. In 1994 Governor Engler passed laws that allow for heavy fines to be implemented against striking teacher and he almost passed a law limiting the Teacher's Union right's to collective bargaining. He is the right wing nut job that started the cry for publicly funded charter schools and a stauch receiver of contributions from the Devos family/NAM. There is hope--there's a proposal on the Nov. ballot that mandates Educational spending to be funded every year with adjustments for the cost of living and inflation.

2006-10-16 09:05:59 · answer #1 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0 0

i visit assert the Detroit Tigers, the Tigers and the White Sox have a make up game left between one yet another because of the fact of final nighttime's rainout. which would be made up this Monday which replaced into their final destroy day of the commonplace season. yet having suggested that still the solid question is how badly do the Chicago White Sox p.c. it? Or how undesirable does the two communities p.c. it, it could be very obtainable that the two communities will do the comparable ingredient for the subsequent couple of weeks based how the two communities play contained in here couple of weeks. the entire ingredient won't be resolved till the final sequence of the year, for the White Sox on the line at Cleveland and for the Detroit Tigers on the line against the Kansas city Royals.

2016-12-26 20:51:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The settled for a contract that I think benefited both the schools and the teachers. I think anytime that a union runs into a company or in this case a school board that refuses to negotiate an equable contract then they should be allowed to withhold services. That is the only thing that they have to keep it fair.

2006-10-16 08:21:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The union should fight unfair labor practices. It should; however, allow better teachers to be paid more and crap teachers to be fired. Whenever there's unfair labor practices it has been unions that fought for the rights of the worker. I admire them for that. Then they took it one step too far and started protecting their workers even when they were not up to par. That's what's hurt their reputation so badly.

2006-10-16 08:22:05 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1 1

You do mean the state government don't you? Michigan teachers are amongst the highest paid in the nation. They have teachers strikes like some people change their underwear. This was even going on when I was a kid way back when. Their strikes are tired and glad they had take a pay cut.

2006-10-16 08:20:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

The Union should go away. That is what would be best for the students. Overpaid whiney teachers

2006-10-16 08:33:19 · answer #6 · answered by godoompah 5 · 0 1

Everyone got to cold to strike the only heat was at the schools.

2006-10-16 08:19:32 · answer #7 · answered by Rocketman 2 · 0 1

the teachers in Detroit ruined the eduction of the children who didnt go to private school. the result is a state of full of welfare rejects

2006-10-16 08:21:59 · answer #8 · answered by S H I R A Z ! 1 · 0 2

Hey, Hell! Because everybody got shot? I don't know. It probably wasn't fair, amicable, nor pleasant, though. You know how that goes.

2006-10-16 08:22:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers