One country with WMD is enough to be a World threat for Peace.
2006-10-16 07:08:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Regime? Israeli?
The way your question is worded indicates a preconceived dislike on your part of the Israeli governement... I doubt any answer would convince you otherwise.
2006-10-16 07:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by Lanani 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Israeli is allowed because they are surrounded by very friendly neighbours like Palestine, Syria and Iran who are pro Islamic governments who hates the sight of Israelis. Iranian President has already said he would like to wipe Israel out of the map. So how do u expect Israelis to live without WMD?
2006-10-16 14:53:40 · answer #2 · answered by Scouser7674 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Firstly i'll open with a a bit humor and then give my opinion...The most dangerous WMD on the planet belongs to the US and he's called George Dubya Bush! Now for my opinion...
When you look at the make-up of modern day politics in the USA you begin to understand why a nation so great in Military and Monetary Power such as the US always bows to a nation such as Isreal.
Its called Political Lobbying. The Jewish lobby in america has such control over both parties that whoever comes to power doesn't have inch to decide on anything reagrding Isreal. Thats why every single UN resolution that has been passed against ISREAL regarding the UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE has been vetoed by the USA. The AIPAC has the USA by the gonads (pardon my french). Basically you kno i can forward you onto many sources of information but what frustrates me is that how 2 rival factions have been allowed to HIJACK nations, religions and races and we the people of these nations, religions and races are jus getting abused by policies that do not have anything to do with our beliefs or constitutions. AMERICA land of the free is no longer free, Islam religion of Peace (thats what islam means by the way) is no longer peaceful. We have to rival factions fighting hear both are fundamentalists, both fighting for their own cause and both will go beyond the limits of human nature for their fight.
The problem is many of us feel as if its nothing to do with us..Truth is we are already INVOLVED, because its us who get hurt, our nations, our beliefs and our races are the ones getting labeled. If everyone in the west really thinks muslims are terrorist because a couple names who bombed the 911 towers were Muslim names wha do u think the Iraqis think, or the Palastinians, or the Lebanese or the Afghans they may have neva met an american or a westerner but the KNOW that the bombs falling on their homes came from their.
SEE THE WAY I SEE IT SOMETHING BIG IS ON ITS WAY. IT TAKES CENTURIES OF CONFLICT TO CREATE SUCH A HOSTILE ENVIROMENT LIKE THERE IS TODAY SHOCKING THING IS....... ITS ONLY BEEN 5 YEARS SINCE 911......WHAT WILL THE NEX 5 BRING.....DO YOU REALLY WANNA LIVE IN A WORLD LIKE THAT..
AS FOR THE INITIAL ANSWER I HAVE NO ANSWER APART FROM JUST STRAIGHT HYPOCRISY!
2006-10-16 14:36:22 · answer #3 · answered by kamz247 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Which democratic country is not being allowed to have WMDs?
"The Israeli regime" does not threaten its neighbors with annihilation every week like Iran, North Korea, etc.
WHO holds the weapons and WHAT they intend to do with them certainly matter. If you had to give an uzi to Mother Teresa or Charles Manson, which would you choose?
(Yes, I know Mother Teresa is dead. Just humor me here, lol.)
2006-10-16 14:17:43 · answer #4 · answered by C = JD 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Which other democratic nation is not allowed WMD? Surely you don't mean North Korea, Iran, Libya, Cuba go to the dictionary and look up the word Democratic.
2006-10-16 14:34:33 · answer #5 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Many countries were given special considerations for signing agreements to not produce atomic energy. North Korea is given tons and tons of food and just as much oil so that Kim could keep enlarging his army. He accepted to food ( and still expects us to continue shipping it ) but broke his contract to not experment with Atomic power. Do you see anything wrong with breaking international agreements ?
Israel did not have any international agreements to not produce atomic weapons. Do you believe that contracts should be upheld, or are contracts and signatures just a load of bull to you ?
2006-10-16 14:24:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋