would you rather be a giraffe with no neck, or a turtle with no shell?
what kind of social implications would this have on you?
2006-10-16 05:22:43 · 12 answers · asked by Psychodelic Chicken 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
If I was with you I'd be anything you want me to be ;) However if I was a giraffe you could ride me!!! Yeah I'll go with giraffe.
2006-10-16 05:30:19 · answer #1 · answered by Country Boy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Giraffe
2006-10-16 12:28:07 · answer #2 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A giraffe with no neck I can be a turtle with no shell every day when I feel like it
2006-10-16 12:30:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Giraffe!
2006-10-16 12:45:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd be a giraffe with no neck. I don't think a turtle can live without his shell.
2006-10-16 12:28:33 · answer #5 · answered by Marenight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say giraffe with no neck, a turtle with no shell has no defense mechanism, a jiraffe with no neck can still run.
2006-10-16 12:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a giraffe bc i could still protect myself and find food. i might fall over trying to eat, but it would be better than a turtle with no armor
2006-10-16 12:25:29 · answer #7 · answered by gardener24 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a giraffe
2006-10-16 12:27:02 · answer #8 · answered by daveyboyone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
giraffe. because if a turtle had no shell it would be eaten.
2006-10-16 12:25:15 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ Ywanica ♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither.... there is no way I would compare my human life to an animal. I believe you earn what you get no matter what social implications come about.
2006-10-16 12:53:40 · answer #10 · answered by AL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋