It should be hosted after every 2 years that would be more entertaining
2006-10-16 05:15:20 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
true!!!! but the countries need time 2 prepare!!! and so do the players so i think it's good that it's every 4 years!!!
2006-10-17 06:48:01 · answer #1 · answered by <3Portugal Lover<3 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The way that the game is set up now, it would be difficult for it to be more frequently. All the continental federations have their events set up to run in the intervening years, and the qualifying for the tournament itself takes over two years for some parts of the world, so it isn't rweally possible.
The world cup is a special event and 4 years is the right length of time. It is on a par with the Olympics, which is every 4 years, and it should stay that way, as if you have it more frequently, it becomes less of a special occasion.
2006-10-16 13:43:13 · answer #2 · answered by onetruekev 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. It's too often and it's not fair for the players. They have UEFA competitions, EURO or COPA or ASIAN cup, it takes 2 years to qualify, and plus the players have lives to live. They have family, friends, and they need time for themselves. Plus, if it's every two years, it would be boring, you don't know how much excitement comes in a World Cup after waiting 4 years. But I understand, I asked this question too, it would be great. I LOVE BRAZIL! And I cried when they lost and I felt depressed after WC ended. All that excitement and competition is gone. But don't worry, there's always other games! FORCA BRASILIA!
2006-10-16 15:41:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be great if it was held every two years, but then it would have to cut back on quality and spending. Four years (or more) allows planning for such a big event, as well as finding big sponsors and building/renovating new facilities. .
2006-10-16 12:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by Janji 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I KNOW!! ITS TOO MANY YEARS TO WAIT FOR!! :/ it sucks. :/ i LOVE world cup. :) its the best. :) i want it back, haha lol. yeah, it would be so awesome if it was every 2 years, but there is euro cup and asian cup and stuff in between the world cups, so thats why they dont have it every 2 years i guess.. :/
*by the way, i love ronaldo too. :) so yeah, i just love your picture. i dont think hes hot or anything (cause he looks like my cousin, haha) but yeah, i love him, he's one of my favorite players! :)
2006-10-16 18:45:18 · answer #5 · answered by doober 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OFCORCE ME THAT'S NOT FAIR!!!!!!!!!!!I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT WATCHING THE FIFA WORLD CUP ON T.V!!!
BUT IT SHOULD BE HOSTED AFTER EVERY (1)YEAR!!AND THAT WOULD BE MORE ENTERTAINING!!AND THEN IF IT IS EVERY 4 YEARS THE SOCCER PLAYERS WILL BE SOOOOOOOOOO OLD WITH WITE HAIR!!OH NOOOOOOO!
THANK'S
BYE!
2006-10-16 21:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ gee4g♫♫♫ 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you're right... but it's a very EXPENSIVE event and the time frame gives participants ample amount of time for training and building up strength and/ or speed! Also gives the underaged participants time to age so that they CAN participate.
2006-10-16 12:24:04 · answer #7 · answered by Song 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
4 years is perfect.
Any more regularly would just devalue the whole thing...plus it takes three years to plan and play all the qualifying matches around the world.
2006-10-16 12:30:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
DUDE, ITS WAY TO LONG. I THINK THAT THIS YEAR HAS BEEN THE MOST POPULAR YEAR FOR THE WORLD CUP. THEY CAN'T STOP NOW. 4 YEARS IS WAY TO LONG. AND BESIDES, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO SEE FERNANDO TORRES WITHOUT THE WORLD CUP. HES SO DAMM HOTTTTT!!!!!!!!
2006-10-16 22:36:09 · answer #9 · answered by MrsTorres4life 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, no, no...no rushing. Four years is more than enough to enjoy a victory fully.
Bring on the next 3! while I seat back and enjoy the bragging rights.
ha ha.
2006-10-16 16:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by Barça! 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋