Fox superstar Bill O'Reilly is running neck-and-neck with Washington Post editor Bob Woodward as the two vie for top spot on the New York Times list of nonfiction best sellers.
In the Time's list published this past Sunday, Woodward's Bush-bashing book, "State of Denial," came in as No. 1, with O'Reilly's "Culture Warrior" close on Woodward's heels in the No. 2 spot.
Last week, "Culture Warrior" was No. 1 and will take the No.1 slot
yet again!
The Times has reviewed Woodward's book positively.
But so far the paper stubbornly refuses to review O'Reilly's books.
The New York Times has fallen so low on the ethical journalism scale, that it is actually embarrasing!
They are so Far Left Wing Radical ACLU Supporting, that their readership has dropped 38% in the last year alone...instead or reporting the hard News...they fabricate it !!
Refusing to Review Mr O'Reillys Best Sellers books is symptomatic of the "control" they attempt to exert over the public.
Why?
2006-10-16 03:51:29 · 5 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
It never ceases to amaze me that all the obvious "Liberal" responses herein recorded all resort to "Name Calling, "Character assasinations/denigration", and Insults"!
Liberals just "don't", "won't", "can't" engage in a debate or "dialog"?
It's amazing just read these replies herein...Amazing!
I just asked a straight-foward statement/question why a Newspaper that reports an Author as a Best Seller 4 times for all 4 of his books and does not interview him ... or Review any of them and is questioned "why" ... prompts these personal attacks on my person and his?
That's Facism!
2006-10-16 05:50:33 · update #1
its like you said they ARE left wing, and are biased which a newspaper is NOT supposed to be, now Bill's book is number one as of yesterday, i bought it and it really opens your eyes, and is based on FACT, the times has been in hot water before for not reporting the facts, just don't buy there paper, i don't i never know what is the truth and what isn't
2006-10-16 04:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by AFwife 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer understand why the long island circumstances hasn't reviewed bill's e book. i do no longer examine the long island circumstances, so i do no longer understand lots approximately them. yet you needless to say are partial to bill O'Reilly. there are multiple situations the place bill has been shown flat out mendacity. He makes use of incorrect info, and fabricated evidence to assist his perspectives. in case you hear to O'Reilly, you're no longer to any extent further desirable them the human beings who hear to the supposedly Left Wing long island circumstances. Like I pronounced, i do no longer understand lots approximately them, yet i understand bill is a liar. in case you do not have self assurance that, you're incorrect.
2016-10-19 12:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by briscoe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You ansered your own questions...papers are usually either right or left wing supporters, and they choose to focus on whichever side they lean to. myou as the consumer have every right not to buy their paper.
2006-10-16 03:54:53 · answer #3 · answered by moluvsmark 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bill O'Reilly is too biased to have credible opinions
2006-10-16 05:49:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It is their left wing bias.
2006-10-16 03:58:37 · answer #5 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋