Great question. But you left one out. Big John Stud. (going back a ways for that one.)
But sticking to the group you pointed out. I have to go with Undertaker.
Here's the why.
Kane and Taker have worked together in the past and actually would be the smallest of the big guys. So I would see them at least initially teaming up.
Big Show would probably attack Andre
Nash would probably try to team up with Sid but one or the other would quickly back stab the other and that would be the end of their team work.
Don't know as much about Kurgan, Khali and Gonazles but let just imagine they are all big enough to think they can go it alone and just start hammering people.
One by one the team of Kane and Taker would take out the other guys until it was only the two of them left.
Then your back to the old Kane vs Taker war from the past and if I remember correctly Taker won most of those.
Now if we are talking about everyone staying on their own then I've got to go with the original Andre.
Cool question.
2006-10-16 06:06:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a hard question for all the Battle of The Big Men. I think is nobody going to win because it will had a lot of injuries and blood going to be everywhere in the ring, outside of the ring, on stage, backstage or even in parking lot.
2006-10-16 06:57:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by fe_fe3000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tough question- especially if it's a street fight...I'd have to say Taker- out of all the big men listed he is the only one with the speed, power and stamina to win this match- The only exception would be if Kevin Nash was portraying his Deisel Character- If that was the case I'd give it to Deisel but thats the only way I see Taker losing.
2006-10-16 03:37:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by geom1974 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
a million.Kevin Nash vs Kane: Even in his best Nash become in simple terms length & capability.Kane isn't in basic terms length & capability he can fly . Which he does in simple terms approximately each tournament. Kane wins this one. to assert Kane is underrated is a understatement. 2.Batista Vs Goldberg: Batista is capability & rage have been as Goldberg is soccer. i'm a Goldberg fan yet regardless of the Jack Knife & Spear i could nevertheless supply this one to Batista. 3.Brock Lesnar VS Vader:Vader has capability + he's a brawler yet that may not beat somebody who has not in basic terms capability and rage yet a wrestling lower back floor besides. Brocks the winner. 4.Sid Vicious VS huge teach:teach is huge , efficient & sluggish. Sid is huge, efficient,agile & rage. 4 against 2 the final public wins Sid Vicious. 5.Yokozuna Vs Abdulla the Butcher: I undergo in innovations who Abdulla become.He become sturdy yet sluggish witted . Yokozuna become a Sumo Wrestler, the only he ought to possibley lose become if he chosen to. 6.Umaga vs Undertaker: enable's settle for information the only way all human beings beats the Taker is by utilising cheating or organic luck. Umaga in simple terms isn't that fortunate. You get yet another star.
2016-11-23 14:28:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Legend ~ The Phenom ~ The Undertaker
2006-10-16 03:42:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Kane
2006-10-16 03:38:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by omg 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Randy the Macho Man Savage for a street fight.
2006-10-16 03:33:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Thanks for the Yahoo Jacket 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Id say that Kane would win, he can take a beating and dish it out at the same time
2006-10-16 03:45:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Double A 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
THe Knew KANE 2000-???
Or takor
2006-10-16 12:17:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by austen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i know all of those guys will be getting some stiches at the end of the day!!! May be they will even have to take a long breat before coming back
2006-10-16 06:23:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by fulla 1
·
0⤊
0⤋