English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what's wrongwhat have i done

2006-10-16 01:42:52 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

not nice proud american.she is ot nice at all calling me NAMES.i think a had enough of this site

2006-10-19 03:06:39 · update #1

4 answers

Don't know. Don't know who MONA is. On here, probably didn't have a better answer and wanted the points. In real life, would need more facts. Good Luck

2006-10-16 01:56:42 · answer #1 · answered by old_woman_84 7 · 2 0

This has some lovely moments. In particular: it opens extremely well: Do you know of the apple grove, lying just beneath the brook of thought, between the paths carved by Ghandi’s wrinkled hands? Here, you show an apple grove beside a brook - one carved by old hands. I'm not quite sure about a 'brook of thought' (brooks are usually made of water) - but the rest of the image is almost physical enough to make me forget my misgivings. The poem starts to wobble a bit soon after that: The greetings of robins as red as almata, (what is 'almata'? Why can't robins be as red as robins?) - but there is still enough for the eye to feast on to almost carry this off. And the wobbling continues. The bridges and the oak trees are good; but I have never seen a path with an anchor - nor do I understand why a path would need one. The poem never quite falls over, and there are good things on offer almost to the very end. But caverns, and pear trees, and blue-jays are all real things: I know what you mean you you talk about them. But tea has filled sullen bellies, And morning apricots pruned, ??? How can a belly be 'sullen'? For that matter, how do you fill a belly with tea? Tea just isn't very filling (or do you mean that these bellies have been cut out, and are being used as bladders)? How do you fill apricots with tea? And why would you? ........ Cassie58 manages to deal with subtle and profound ideas in simple language and imagery (see link). This is the way poetry usually works, and there are good reasons why this is so. This poem, broadly speaking, is good when it is concrete (bridges, oaks, blue jays and stones); weak when it gets misty (sincerity, contemplative seeds, oliver twist). I hope you continue posting; but I hope most of all that you work towards a simpler, richer way of writing. 'No ideas but in things' is what William Carlos Williams suggested as a way of writing poetry. This is still excellent advice.

2016-05-22 06:06:13 · answer #2 · answered by Paula 4 · 0 0

Who is Mona? Why do you care what she thinks?

2006-10-16 01:59:49 · answer #3 · answered by eva b 5 · 1 0

OMG......LOL.... thats all I can say...LOL

2006-10-16 12:50:52 · answer #4 · answered by Humor me.. 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers