Nutbush City, after the old Tina Turner song.
(Republicans would think this would be a sufficient acknowledgment of the black community, and bipartisan because of the reference to Jimmy Carter's family business)
2006-10-16 01:38:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Washington replaced right into a founding father, respected and difficulty-free, George W. Bush is a conceited and obdurate indvidual who has informed lies to Congress and the yankee human beings, besides as to the international. His debacle and farce, The conflict and occupation of Iraq is the top result if his total incompetence as a international chief.
2016-12-04 21:27:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by kuelper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think no ,reason is I dont like him at all .He ruined the whole Iraq.he is jealous about North Korea's nuclear weapons......Almost all the peope in India dont like him .So only they protested againt his arrival once when he came to India for nuclear deal..SO IT SHOULD NOT BE RENAMED LIKE THAT
2006-10-18 01:44:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♣Ben *10♣ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WTF you know nothing about the US. I would like to see you come over to S.E. DC and say that. Over 80% of D.C hate bush. They are all Democrats and Bush is a Republican. D.C is mostly African Americans and bush is white. Enough said.
2006-10-16 01:27:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by krop d 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
The people salute our glorious leader! May he rule for 1,000 years!
2006-10-16 01:20:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by mr_mumbles_nyc 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nop
2006-10-16 20:38:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mohana M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO FREGIN WAY!!!!!!!!
2006-10-16 01:26:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by gamaof5sofar 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO IT SHLDNT BE.
2006-10-16 01:26:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by christina 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol, or BUSHINGTON
2006-10-16 01:20:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cap'n Donna 7
·
0⤊
0⤋