The only thing I accuse Bush of is being too soft. More troops, more results, more advancement, and less of this using our armed forces for 'stabilization' or 'security'. Let them do what they're good at them bring 'em home when that entire **** hole called the middle east is cleaned up.
2006-10-15 23:57:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Saddam should have complied before he was invaded.
The UN had already had resolution in place that allowed it.
The Iraqi people should have dealt with the tyrant but were unable or unwilling.
There is not a weapon that Saddam owned that was not used against his own people.
When did Bush do this to his people?
Get your facts straight.
Bin Laden is a terrorist. He deliberately kills innocents to create fear. When did Bush target innocents to cause fear? Do you really think the US couldn't kill more civilians if that was their intent?
I blame him for being too soft. Not punishing communities that support terrorists. He is trying to keep the peace in Iraq even though he should just let Muslim kill Muslim.
When the US leaves it will still be Muslim killing Muslim like it has been for a hundred years.
Keep supporting Saddam and Bin Laden and we will see how that goes for ya...
2006-10-16 07:28:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Red 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bin Ladin runs AlQuida a group that flew planes into the World Trade Center. He represents no country, just an ideology.
Saddam used his chemicals to kill Kurds, specifically Kurds who did not have the opportunity to vote him out as he was a dictator who wanted complete control of the oil fields in the northern part of Iraq, where the Kurds lived. The Americans used a strong herbicide, which killed the jungle so they could see their targets.
As to whether or no Jesus loves him I have no idea, but he is several rungs up the heavenly ladder above Saddam
2006-10-16 07:17:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by justa 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well god bubush i mean president bush believe in a new world order and your either with him to do this or against him.He is prettycrafty he give aid to part of a country to get them fighting then say they are evil lets rescue themBut if you check close it is oil countries on most part.He call down n korea because of the korean war they couldnot win the states is the only country to use an atomic weapon to commit genocide and not be called terrorists Theykilled hundreds of thousand s of innocent women and childrenThey still have these weaponb and unless a country has bushes approval not the un approval they not bush are the dangerous war mongers not good old bush and when he holler these un pussy cats better say how hi on thier way up After all who draws up the sanctions he want and woe betide the country that opposes him
2006-10-16 07:28:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by our choice 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Bush didnt hijack and crash planes into buildings. I dont completely agree with the war in Iraq and Afghanistan but I believe we have to root out and stop these tyrants. I dont think the Kurds were revolutionaries either, they just wanted a place of their own to live peacefully.
2006-10-16 06:58:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by fuck off 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
because Bush is trying to keep harm off of our streets,
sure he does NOT want to kill the innocent, BUT he does not want us to end up having another 9-11 either
( just my way of thinking ) take care
2006-10-16 06:57:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by start 6-22-06 summer time Mom 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden started it, Bush will finish it.
2006-10-16 08:11:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush has made his murdering rampage public knowledge whilst the terrorist keeps his intentions secret I thnk that is what seperates them.
2006-10-16 06:58:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by jimbob 1
·
1⤊
4⤋
Hey! Why dont you go live with binny or saddam, I hear they like it up the butt.
2006-10-16 06:55:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by debra_har 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
he might of but the right wing newspaper here in the U.S. tell you want Mr. Bush what you to here
2006-10-16 06:49:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋