English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

cant u see that every time amirica does something good the benifits goes to the american and the british acopperation and every time something bad happens its the policy of bush and america - and britain isnt included in that -
people of america tony blair is taking advantage of ur lake of civilization and history and that will make them a greater country with a great leader - even if he isnt directly a leader to britain but he is he is playing with the economic and with the policy even YOU amiricans-
please tell me what you have agnest my point of view

2006-10-15 22:43:52 · 9 answers · asked by maze 1 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

No, they can't see. All they see is through their own eyes, their own experiences, they're own selfish brains. For all their education, they are still told what to do, and they obey. They never think of what someone from another country must feel like. They never think of the consequences of their own actions. They never stop to think how this will eventually in turn affect them. All they care about is stuffing their guts and their bank accounts.

Britain does not gain anything from helping America. It thought it was the right choice, but they realise how wrong they are now.

2006-10-15 23:43:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you are saying that the benefits of anything that is positive goes to both the USA and Britain but when something goes negative, the USA gets the blame and Britain does not and that is all Tony Blair's doing, I do not see how you think that situation is Tony Blair's fault. Can you show me how Tony Blair is responsible for that? Anyway, Tony Blair and Britain has been a staunch Allie of the USA and I am one American that is thankful and I thank God for it.

2006-10-15 23:17:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First what is ur question? Go and read 20 times, If u could understand a bit of what u intended to ask please tell me.

By the way what bit i understood and my answer

Look America is great super power, By aligning with it UK typically or any other nation tend to benefit. Ur NATO is one example. Ofcourse they do business in all spheres and dominate. You have to pay a small price for big things like Security, Aid, package. If u are attacked u have americans to protect U. Don't U ? If u want technology u have americans to give U is it not? With technology u can create millions of jobs do you agree? with millions jobs ur people can earn and spend is it not? All they are asking is some piece of land to station their troops and police the world. What are u going to loose. Look I am not an american I am an Indian.

2006-10-15 22:54:50 · answer #3 · answered by Loganathan Raja Rajun R 3 · 0 0

I'll tell you what i have against your point of view,....... It's just plain wrong, thats what.

Can you actually think of anything bush/ america has done of late that has actually benefited britain? In the UK at the moment we are trying to get rid of blair because he is seen as being bush's puppet.

I doubt anyone is trying to take advantage of your 'lake of civilisation and history' appart from it might be a nice place to spend a summers holiday!!!

2006-10-15 22:51:15 · answer #4 · answered by jonny Atlantis 2 · 2 0

I've always wondered what Blair got out of his alliance with Bush. Walks on a lease, a special treat? There may have been unwritten understandings and secret deals about divvying up the post war "reconstruction" of Iraq. That's all I can figure.

2006-10-15 22:56:56 · answer #5 · answered by Skip F 3 · 0 0

Divide and conquer isn't going to work.

We Americans and the Brits can have disagreements with out killing one another. Yea sometimes our leaders stink and so does theirs but the Brits are like our brothers.
If you can't make a buck off your brother than who can you make a buck off?

2006-10-15 23:24:08 · answer #6 · answered by Red 5 · 0 0

Is English a foreign language for you?

2006-10-16 00:47:18 · answer #7 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 0 0

I'm against your spelling to start... "agnest"?

Do you honestly expect to be taken seriously with grammar like that?

2006-10-15 23:17:40 · answer #8 · answered by futurefbiguy 2 · 0 0

no im fed up listening now

2006-10-15 22:45:07 · answer #9 · answered by sleepwalker69 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers