should the Redskins change Quaterback?

Answer 1

The Redskins should change coach.

Answer 2

Changing the QB won't save this team. He's the best chance the Skins have to come out of this season with a respectable record. This isn't like Arizona or Tennessee where the kid that you're bringing off the bench is a high draft pick with tons of potential to develop. Washington would have a different result than those two teams if the QB were changed... it'd be more like Oakland's QB change, which did nothing to fix their problems. The Redskins have bigger issues than the QB position, the team problems will still be there after the switch, and the kid won't be able to handle it as well as the veteran.

I definitely agree that the Redskins need a new owner more than a new QB! Dan Snyder is the worst owner I've seen in a long time. He overpays for veterans with big names and throws them all onto the team together and expects it to buy him a Super Bowl. When the guys fizzle, he just goes out and buys another player. The Skins never seem to have any chemistry, though, especially on defense. They don't seem to be a "team" under Snyder's ownership as much as a collection of football players in the same uniform.

You think Snyder's Six Flags deal is bad business sense? He's also the guy that just got into a partnership with Tom Cruise's production company after Paramount cut Cruise loose for being such a whacko.

If I'm a Redskins fan, I really think Dan Snyder is the biggest problem the organization has and you're gonna have a hard timem winning under his regime. Since I'm a Giants fan, I hope he's your owner for a long long time. :)

Answer 3

I think it would help if fans had realistic expectations of the Redskins. As soon as Joe Gibbs arrived, everyone seemed to think that a Super Bowl was theirs to be had that year. It takes time to implement a new offense and defense, and there were several personnel changes. Patrick Ramsey was a thorn in the side for a while--but he hadn't done much to prove his worth in the NFL and yet complained he should be the starter. Brunell can be good, but there are other issues with the team, so I'd say to stick with him at least for a while.

Answer 4

Not yet. Wait for one more loss and then call it a season. Put Campbell on the field for next year. I don't see the Redskins beating the Colts on Sunday.

Memo to Snyder: Stop getting washed up players. The only good move was getting Portis, but we lost the best CB in Bailey.

Answer 5

Nah! they should change owner. He spent so much money in getting expensive and talented players, hiring the team's former coach back(the one who brought them to the Super Bowl), and still, the team will not make it to the Super Bowl and their performace has been pathetic. The team has a decent defense, decent offense, decent enough QB...and NOTHING!!!...The owner is bringing bad luck to the team. He even acquired Six Flags, and look what's happening to it, the poor theme park is going bankrupt. He should just stay home and eat his cheetos...And I wasn't surprised when they lost to the Titans at all...

Answer 6

Not unless thay are giving up on the season. Brunell gives them the best chance to win and make the playoffs, but losing to the Titans is a very bad sign.

Answer 7

after u lose to the titans you should change somethin. and brunell is garbage but i don't think they have a better answer than him. redskins are just a bad team they gotta live with it.

Answer 8

yes mix it up and give some experience to the others for next year......no chance for now this year will be a wash

Answer 9

Yea to whom the rest suck even worse dawg

Answer 10

no keep him please