English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

I really like Batista & Lashley, but I'm not a huge Umaga fan. I think several of the WWE guys are seriously overrated. I would like to see them get big pushes because of their excellence in the ring, not how good they look. I think the really pumped-up guys get preference because they look good on camera. Both Lashley & Batista have awesome bodies & good looking faces. I suppose when you're promoting wrestlers, you look at it like - with faces & bodies like that, who needs to be brilliant in the ring?

2006-10-15 19:31:03 · answer #1 · answered by Sarah E 4 · 0 0

No, Lashley and Batista are NOT overrated. These guys are trying to make a name for themselves that sticks around, and to do that, they need to partake in matches against equal, less, more equal to them, etc. They're not overrated. Umaga, on the other hand, is overrated, because while he may be stronger than many of his opponents, gets more credit than he deserves.

2006-10-18 11:54:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

you'll probably get more responses if you put this in the wrestling catagory. and being that umaga is rosey---yes he is. lashley and batista make for a good match , but really haven't been around that long.

2006-10-16 02:23:25 · answer #3 · answered by freaky1 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers