Different structure? Different members of the Security Council? More members of the Council? More power, less power? The UN, as it stands, is not the most effective organization... what would you change?
2006-10-15 18:40:00 · 15 answers · asked by Samantha R 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The UN is beyond change, it is far too corrupt. We need to disband it and start all over again, that's how I would change it. Oh, and other countries other than the US need to pitch in financially.
2006-10-15 18:44:04 · answer #1 · answered by letitcountry 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Change the name from United Nations Security Council to Utter Nonsense Security Council. NATO already has a new name which is No Action Talk Only nations.
2006-10-15 20:55:27 · answer #2 · answered by Scouser7674 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first thing I would change is the location. That is, get it the hell out of the US! The UN is worthless. The idea of making it the worlds governing body is ridiculous as well. You mean to tell me that anybody in the US would allow a majority of foreign powers to be able to dictate to us what we can and can't do? What our citizens are allowed to own as personal property. Are you going to let the rest of the world govern us? This UN idea was suggested by an earlier poster. Baloney!!!! That will NEVER happen! If the other countries won't pay their fair share, than let it go broke and die a natural death. The USA should not keep paying the lions share in keeping it operable. Tell them how much we will pay and then pay no more than that. They will either get their acts together or good riddance.
2006-10-15 20:58:08 · answer #3 · answered by price7204 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great question. Get rid of natios that want to wipe other nations from the map (Iran wants to destry Israel with a nuclear bomb} Take away voting right of nations that do not go along with the Security Council and have a strong head
2006-10-15 18:53:27 · answer #4 · answered by devora k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Change their discrimnation: To apply for a job you need degrees to work with them;
Teachers with degrees for instance, cannot be better teachers tan those with only diploma's. Stupid criteria they have for jobs.
Then also their credibility: What are they doing for instance to rid the world of a madman like Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe?
Not to speak about many other Arican leaders who are dictators that kill minority groups to stay in power.
African politics stinks, but they are supported by taxpayers money from all over the world.
Even South Africa currently are governed by communists who don't know what the word democracy mean.They are corrupt and the country now is a 3rd world country. Glad apartheid is gone, but what happensnow are worse!
More than 40% are unemployed. Polititians are corrupt and are treated like heroes when they go to jail.
Yes, they must open their eyes to reality!
2006-10-15 18:58:22 · answer #5 · answered by TP asking 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remove the Superpowers from the Security Council,
Equal contributions from the states to avoid influence,
Transfer the UN headquarters to a neutral country, and
Make UN as a world government.
2006-10-15 18:54:02 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This needs total structual change, revise moto ("which is definitely to server the nato power no matter what") right now....some changes in Security Council. like every year member will be rotate no fix memebers.
and definitly Equal Power to all nations to participate and vote....no vito rule.
2006-10-15 18:56:27 · answer #7 · answered by aarshi72 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might anticipate everlasting 15%+ unemployment. Spain has already long previous down the path of attempting to construct a green financial gadget and has applied a cap and commerce gadget. Unemployment there is already at 20% and that they anticipate it to circulate larger. Economists have predicted Spain's unemployment fee will attain 22% in 2010. Economists have calculated that for each "green" activity created, 2.2 different jobs are lost. there isn't any reason to think of the yankee adventure will selection. shop this all in strategies once you're interior the vote casting sales area, and once you're discussing the way you will vote inclusive of your acquaintances.
2016-12-26 20:20:15 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, first of all I'd give them some brass balls wrapped up nice and tidy since it seems that they're in need of some. Then I'd get rid of the personal agendas and the corruption -- oh wait -- we'd be left without a U.N. if I did all that...
Back to the drawing board.
2006-10-15 18:43:37 · answer #9 · answered by Writer of Truth 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Eliminate it all together...it's widely known they are ineffective.
Just look at the recent N.K. debacle. Everyone chose to put sanctions on them..but they were not going to enforcre them.....just like they did with Iraq...13 resolutions...and none were enforced...just like Hezbollah...they are to be disarmed....not going to happen...
I say pack em up and move them to another country..that would save this country a few billion on building maintenance and upkeep alone.
2006-10-15 18:52:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋