Did neil amstrong land in moon? idont think so bcoz i hav solid proofs like that the flag was flying in that?

Question

vaccum atmospere without the air,andthe kodak film will melt in that hot,and how can he take the photos clearly and accuratley by keeping on his chest and many more questions i have

Answer 1

The photos were taken with a tri-pod, and there where live video feeds, of which I'm sure other countries could have intercepted and would have been able to determine that the transmissions were coming from the moon. And if u think they filmed it on earth... well then can u explain how they artificially created a lower gravitational force as they walked, or was it brilliant graphical manipulation form the 60s. Exactly... i don't think so.
(Take a look at the publicly available films on the moon, like hitting a golf ball on the moon, all on NASA's web site).

Answer 2

1) The "moon race" was an extension of the cold war. It was mostly about national prestige. We got there first and achieved our primary objective. There was some good science: surveys, measurements, sample collection. But it was mostly about being there first. Once we achieved our primary objective, there was no political will to go back. There still isn't. Perhaps, if we discover He3 or something else valuable, there will be.

2) In 1972, there was a politically motivated burglary of a hotel room in the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D.C. There were only about six or eight people who knew about it. However, those people, including Richard M. Nixon, the President of the United States, failed to keep that burglary a secret. It exploded into a scandal that drove the President and a number of others from office.

If six or eight people couldn't keep a hotel room burglary a secret, then how could literally thousands of people could have kept their mouths shut about six faked moon landings? Not just one moon landing, but six of them!

3) Even if NASA and other government agencies could have faked the six moon landings well enough to fool the general public, they could NOT have fooled the space agency or military intelligence types in the USSR. The Soviets were just dying to beat us. If the landings were faked, the Soviets would have re-engineered their N-1 booster and landed on the moon just to prove what liars Americans are. Why didn't they? Because the landings were real and the Soviets knew it.

Answer 3

These, and other, questions have ALL been answered.

The flag was embedded with wires to make it look like it was in the wind. The simple verification is that the flag ALWAYS shows the same furling. You would have to assume that NASA was brilliant to stage a hoax but so STUPID to forget that the Moon has no wind. Even if it were a hoax, the flag would have still been constructed with wires to keep it from fluttering in the wind.

The film was irrelevant, the astronauts would have melted under full lunar daylight. That's why there are always the pesky long shadows; they didn't go out during full daylight. Additionally, the cameras had sufficient thermal mass to keep the film relatively cool for the time they were actually outside.

The cameras were all relatively wide field of view, which means that anything beyond about 1 ft would be in focus, due to the long depth of focus.

I suggest that you spend more time studying your physics, math, optics, and geometry so that you can ask and solve these types of questions on your own, instead of listening to a bunch of BS from paranoid schizophrenics.

Answer 4

of path Armstrong landed on the Moon. The evidence is overwhelming and convinces each proper expert: photograph analysts, engineers, astrophysicists, filmmakers, historians, and specific-effects human beings. in assessment the few people who attempt to enable you understand the Apollo missions have been pretend are not qualified in any extremely proper container, and various on no account even finished college. they only want interest and maybe some money. once you notice what they actually ought to declare, it comes right down to a huge 0. they haven't any extremely evidence of a cooked up tale, or Hollywood, or otherwise inexplicable habit from NASA. they're going to provide you various hypothesis, of path. yet usually what they attempt to do is enable you understand lame the clarification why they think of you ought to not pay interest to the mountain of evidence that exists in want of Apollo. EDIT a million: No, notwithstanding Buzz Aldrin become exact because of fact the "lunar module pilot," the commander Neil Armstrong genuinely did the Lunar Module flying. Aldrin's duties comprised usually working the coaching computer and working with the verbal substitute. He additionally examine off a number of important gadgets (descent value, altitude, horizontal waft sensors) to Armstrong who wanted Aldrin to try this for him. EDIT 2: specific, i'm specific a lie detector attempt will instruct it. enable's get all of the conspiracy concept authors and lead them to take polygraph tests to work out (a) whether or no longer they even have the talents they declare, and (b) whether or no longer they even have self assurance their very own hype or are in simple terms attempting to get usual and sell issues to gullible human beings. astonishing how various human beings bounce on the prospect to question the honesty of astronauts and correctly-properly-known engineers, yet no person seems keen to question the honesty of a few nobodies attempting to get wealthy via trashing human beings's accomplishments.

Answer 5

You're absolutely right. Congress let NASA spend billions of dollars to build a movie set in Nevada so they could fake the whole thing. Peter Jackson directed.

Answer 6

The flag had wires in it that made it look like it was flying. Yes, Neil Armstrong landed on the moon. So did several others.

Answer 7

The flag was spring-loaded. I really hate this stupid question. If you want your own proof, go find somebody with a short focal-length telescope, and look at the landing site for yourself.

Answer 8

a person I know also thinks they didnt go to the moon. but I belive he did.because armstrong said he saw a UFO. flying around near him and he wouldnt just make that up if he didnt really go to the moon.But the way the feds Lie, it would nt surprise me if they didnt really go.we will probubly never know. they know how to keep secrets. like the Kennedy assasination. they know who really did it,Its good to question.

Answer 9

Check out this website, it is made for people like you who take funny stories for real facts! www.badastronomy.com

Here you'll find scientific answers to all of your so called "solid evidence"

Answer 10

Oh, you poor, poor, POOR misguided child!

Armstrong landed on the moon. Now, stop reading the conspiracy theory rags and do some STUDYING!