2006-10-15 18:11:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I think that would be a big boo boo. You don't mess with Nuclear nations. I think that we can hurt them through other ways. The sanction imposed on them so far will be more damaging than going to war.
Because they are in an economical crisis (go figure how they can afford nukes then) hurting them that way is a wiser move. If we were to start war against them there would be aid in food and water etc sent to them which would help their ecomony.
Basically if they need economical help you don't go and do it by starting a war. If you got yourself into that economical way then you get yourself out instead of spending billions on nukes.
2006-10-15 19:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by gretphemelger 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the war in Korea has been planned long ago
and the powers to be, want to push that country into a nuclear war so that they can respond ten times as heavy
Already in 1998 kissinger has said in Stockholm ,at a Bilderberg meeting .that it was on the Agends to lower the world population by 60%.Prince Philip confirmed this .
and a nuclear war is the only way in which this can be archieved
2006-10-16 01:21:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what nukes, they don't have any nukes, they just proved that to the whole world
2006-10-16 02:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no never USA never attack any nuke capable country. USA only attack poor countries which even dont have bread to eat.
2006-10-16 04:01:48 · answer #4 · answered by Eccentric 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I highly doubt it. China & Russia don't even have our backs.
2006-10-16 01:14:50 · answer #5 · answered by Lami 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WELL I SEE WW3 COMMING IN THE NEXT FEW YRS
2006-10-16 01:19:00 · answer #6 · answered by emart4036 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋