English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

you Tom, and Tom is uploading that same file, and a guy name Jerry downloads it from him, and then authorities caught Jerry for sharing that file. Are Tom and me going to be in trouble too or just Jerry? please try to understand this.

2006-10-15 16:26:55 · 6 answers · asked by 123321 1 in Computers & Internet Security

you Tom, and Tom is uploading that same file, and a guy name Jerry downloads it from him, and then authorities caught Jerry for sharing that file. Are Tom and me going to be in trouble too or just Jerry? please try to understand this. THIS ARE MADE UP PEOPLE AND IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED TO ME.

2006-10-15 16:33:12 · update #1

6 answers

Anyone who allows the file to be uploaded to another user can get into trouble. The person who downloads the file can NOT get into trouble as long as he does not allow it to be uploaded from his computer. If you've noticed, the FBI has NEVER arrested anyone for downloading a bunch of songs/movies. It's always been someone who ALLOWED OTHERS to get copywrited files from them.

2006-10-15 23:26:04 · answer #1 · answered by Army Of Machines (Wi-Semper-Fi)! 7 · 0 0

So your argument is that downloading track might desire to be legalized considering you do unlike a pair of those that are against it? no longer anybody interior the track marketplace are making a sh*t-ton of money. maximum traveling musicians are going into debt to launch an album, even on a label, and it takes approximately 10,000 album revenues (a huge style that maximum bands on small labels may well be fortunate to make over the direction of a pair years) just to break even. Now the argument may well be made that relatively little of them funds that folk pay for an album surely is going to the band, yet in fact this: devoid of the labels, it would be lots harder for a band to launch their track. via helping a label, you help each and all of the bands decrease than that label. yet another argument for loose track is the fact that the band's track reaches a lots larger objective audience. With very underground bands, this is almost impossible to get their stuff in any way different than downloading it. that's extremely actual, and is probable the final benefit of the internet age for musicians. on the comparable time, nevertheless, none of those new followers make any distinction to them in the event that they do no longer pass o a tutor, and purchase the band's T-shirts, etc. So, on the tip of the day, the alternative is as much as you, and there are arguments for the two facets, yet i'm going to assert that i might relatively have my famous band be finished-time musicians, than might desire to paintings a element activity while they may well be traveling, writing, practising, and recording new track.

2016-12-16 08:22:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you are wondering whether its possible to tell that Tom got the file from you, and Jerry from him, the answer is yes. It's actually quite easy - your handshake protocols are all logged, mostly to update your security certificates, but that's a great side effect - people think it's anonymous to be online, so they act like their true selves - it allows the authorities to catch them doing things they shouldn't be. Let's us catch the copyright violations, sure, but also nabs the Kiddie Porn Wackjob Perverts.

Good luck -

Rob

2006-10-15 16:34:37 · answer #3 · answered by Rob 3 · 0 0

Sounds like you, Tom, and Jerry got yourselves in a mess! What was the file? Music, or kiddie porn?

2006-10-15 16:29:47 · answer #4 · answered by shojo 6 · 0 0

If the file is a copywritten file (like music) anyone who uploads or downloads the file can get into trouble.

2006-10-15 16:30:11 · answer #5 · answered by fun_in_chicago 3 · 0 1

absolutely.all will be in trouble.

2006-10-15 16:43:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers