Can you imagine how good the cowboys would be if he didnt have bi polar or a drug problem and he was still there with all the weapons they have now....................by the way how about T.O. and his 3TD game today....for all you doubters this is the part where your foot goes into your mouth
2006-10-15 16:22:51 · 8 answers · asked by anonymous 27 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
well he got released by the montreal alouettes because of his drug problem.....which is the same reason he got cut by bill parcells too.......and the cowboys are my favorite team.....but he was in his 2nd year.....i personally think he would have developped.......dont forget he made the playoffs his first year with bill.....imagine what would happened now
2006-10-15 16:34:01 · update #1
also i think ppl who want romo in dont know what there talking about.......just because he was good in preseason doesnt mean he will be good in regular season.....its a whole different ball game.....plus if they put him in the cowboys season is over and in qb development mode for romo....as much as bledsoe has cement feet he is the best guy on their roster to win games now........dont forget bill wants drew in because he has the best chance of winning a super bowl because he probably will retire soon.......another thing that pisses me off is that when romo gets in and if he plays good then ppl will be saying that bill should have played him sooner when he had time to get familiar with the playbook and had a lot of nfl practice experience
2006-10-15 16:38:21 · update #2
another thing im pissed off about is people who think that the cfl is really bad....its not as good as the nfl obviously but if the cfl is that bad then why isnt ricky busting up 1000 of yards.......even if he wasnt injured he wouldnt have done nothing like hes doing now for toronto
2006-10-16 09:18:50 · update #3
and wcbaseball.....its the media.....a lot of the time there not gonna come out boldly and say the exact reasons why he was released
2006-10-16 09:19:46 · update #4
Quincy Carter at Quarterback. He was not a good QB. The reason Dallas went to the playoffs that year was thier defense. If I remember correctly they were number one that year, or at least a top 5 defense. Carter could not throw consistely to the receivers. He could run which helped him we he did good. As far as Bledsoe is concerned He is doing just fine. The biggest problem with Dallas is the offenseive line. They can not protect the QB. Bledsoe gives Dallas the best QB they have had since Aikman retired. Dallas lost games last year because they did not have a kicker that could make a field goal . With a decent kicker last year, they could have easily gone 12-4 or 13-3 . Dallas was in almost every game with a chance to win. Romo will be a good QB in the future he will need time to develop though. With offensvie line help they will win a lot of games. Without an offensive line , it will not matter who you have at QB. As far as TO only time will tell what happens. Winning usually cures most ills. I have seen lots of disagreements between teammates even on winning teams. That is my opinion.
2006-10-15 17:28:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Cowboys fan, and i've gotta disagree with you - Quincy Carter is not a very good QB. When he was with the Cowboys he never threw more TD's than INT's, his completion percentage wasn't very good, and he got released by a CANADIAN football team...as much as I think bledsoe is an inconsistent statue, i'd take him over quincy any day...that being said, I hope romo gets some starts this season.
No one can ever doubt TO's talent - he's a top-tier WR...his problem is that he is even more emotionally unstable than Quincy...I'm just hoping this all works out.
2006-10-15 16:29:19 · answer #2 · answered by Ben R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Quincy Carter was on the Cowboys they would absolutely suck. He was not that good...yeah he took them to the playoffs one time wow...it wasnt him who led the team, you dont lead the team by throwing more INT's than TD's (21 INT's, 17 TD's). He was never good enough for the NFL, and he wasnt cut from the CFL b/c of his drug problem, b/c he sucked. Get ur facts straight...if you read it directly says "Team officials confirmed that Carter was let go based on his performance on the field during the first week of training camp."
2006-10-15 17:20:30 · answer #3 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the cowboys would have a worse record with quincy carter. T.O should be banned from the league in my opinon. He is an idiot. All he wants is tv time. The eagles kicked him off their team and i would be surprised to see T.O kicked off the cowboys in the next couple years
2006-10-15 16:45:10 · answer #4 · answered by Aaron 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of the Giants win by utilising 10. i think of the Cowboys are having considerable themes now. they have performed undesirable interior the final 4 video games. And now they are disillusioned with Romo in Mexico. And TO hasn't practiced this week.
2016-11-23 13:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's just what the Cowboys need, a drug addict QB. Does drug addict + as*hole = Superbowl? Nah.
2006-10-15 20:46:29 · answer #6 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
those where some bad years . you never knew which carter would show up for the game . he was at times great but more often then not he was just bad .
2006-10-16 03:38:58 · answer #7 · answered by treefrog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would have a better record.
2006-10-15 16:25:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋