Yes. That is what the leaders state. Cut and run or as they say redeployment. They are so dishonest they will not call cutting what it is. As for appeasement, look at how well it failed during Clinton's 8 years. He actually gave N Korea nuclear material. Unbelievable.
2006-10-15 16:34:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
". . .a vote for democrats is a vote for democrat pedophiles."
And a vote for the Republican party isn't???? Get real. Because we don't agree with that sham of a bill called the Patriot Act, and won't go along with allowing the president to violate every angle of a person's civil rights without having any evidence, then we are pedophiles and terrorist sympathizers?
Maybe agreeing that everyone has the right to their own opinion, and not just buying into everything on the internet written by a "republican" that is against the democratic party would give you a little more credibility. But since you have the same thought as the Islamic Extremists (if you don't agree with me, then you are an infidel and must die), I am going to make the conclusion that you are closer to a terrorist sympathizer than I am, or any other democrat is.
Grow up and open the mind.
2006-10-15 16:16:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
on condition that i'm answering this an afternoon after the reality, i'm able to't answer the question as to what is going to take place for a vote to reinstate Democrats into skill, because of fact the election effects have shown that Democrats have a majority interior the domicile and could in all probability win a narrow majority interior the Senate, or a minimum of a stale mate. i visit respond to the question interior the present demanding. So what do Democrats triumphing a majority mean? It ability that united statesa. has given the proverbial midsection finger to the Republican occasion for no longer doing what they must have performed with the just about unmitigated skill they have been given – get our troops out of Iraq, wipe out the Al Qaeda leaders and considerable cells, focus on the actual ideological and recruiting bases of terrorism (i.e. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia), stimulate the economic device years in the past through sound economic coverage extremely of allowing to pass interior the path of the long ordeal of CORRECTING ITSELF (don’t take credits for it Neocons), and unifying the american human beings extremely of dividing them.
2016-10-19 11:31:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't know that !
There you go again painting everybody with the same brush .
Democrats and Republicans have fought and died for this country and there are many in Iraq right now , dying for you to have the right to say what you did in your question .
How dare you question any Americans Patriotism , just because they have a different point of view then you .
We live in America and that's our right to look at things from each side , it doesn't mean they are wrong or your right .
So think next time , before you try to question anyone about their Patriotism .
Oh , by the way have you been in Iraq fighting for your country ?
2006-10-15 16:31:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Personally, I'll leave voting for Democrats to you, after all of the game playing I will vote a straight Repbublican Ballot this Nov. I am sick of the garbage, I do not agree with everything my party does, but I don't agree with anything the Dems stand for so my vote is clear.
2006-10-16 02:02:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is just a stupid slogan. It is not factually accurate as a general statement. The fact is the Democratic Party does not have an alternative plan for Iraq or domestic security. And there are an awful lof of leftie wonks in the New Democratic Party that should scare everyone.
2006-10-15 16:27:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by beckychr007 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is scarcely a Democrat running for any office who does not want to bug out of Iraq and let the terrorists have free rein there.
2006-10-15 16:36:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some Republicans think that becuase democrats don't vote for the patriot act/wire tapping that they are not taking any measures to prevent another terrorist attack and are mearly waiting to be attacked before they do anything. I disagree and hope no one would wish this country be attacked.
2006-10-15 16:08:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Squawkers 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
the latest child predator is a republican congressman that house leader Hastert has started a cover-up for,, Foley,, and Bush embraces Hastert,, Bohner,, Blont,, Reynolds,, and Fordham, who's testimony of over 6 hours was consistent with his original statement,, Republicans can try to keep this investigation going on past the elections in November,, but Hastert gave three different stories about Foley's exploitation of 16 year old page boys,, he has been rated out by his subordinates,,
the Republican party can run but the can't hide
2006-10-15 16:19:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think that question is nuts.
Diplomacy should always came before war. We don't appease terrorists either. We kill them as a last resort.
Blessed are the peacemakers for they are children of God.
2006-10-15 16:09:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Villain 6
·
2⤊
2⤋