Scientific analysis on WTC steel debris undertaken by BYU Professor Steven Jones proves that the twin towers were demolished by means of incendiary devices and the release of the conclusive evidence is imminent?
Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/200606scientificanalysis.htm
2006-10-15 15:51:50 · 16 answers · asked by H.I. of the H.I. 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You'll probably be interested to read this
Steve Watson & Alex Jones / Prisonplanet.com | October 14 2006
A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks.
According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks:
"Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?
Telling the truth 16%
Hiding something 53%
Mostly lying 28%
Not sure 3%"
The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job.
2006-10-17 04:24:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is more evidence, presented for your scrutiny.
FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9
EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7
Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=
Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=
MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made $4 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
2006-10-18 20:38:23 · answer #2 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The tale is a total piece of crap. Thermite consists of iron oxide mixed with aluminum powder, which when ignited yields iron and aluminum oxide. There were enough aluminum furniture pieces in the buildings to supply all the aluminum oxide anyone ever found. And if you seriously believe that anyone would run into a burning building for the purpose of planting demolition charges, you are definitely in need of professional help.
2006-10-15 15:58:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Burning jet fuel last time I check could be considered a incendiary device.
2006-10-22 15:43:16 · answer #4 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I suppose that you could consider a 285,000 lb fully loaded and fully fueled jetliner that burns at 3000 degrees an incendiary device.
2006-10-15 15:56:00 · answer #5 · answered by Norman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
um that was not the conclusion, you skipped a whole step. When will this argument become credible? Probably never, these people are making too much money off it
2006-10-15 16:00:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
NEWSFLASH!!! TERRORISTS EXIST!!!
http://www.911myths.com
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
2006-10-15 15:56:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What IS SO UNBELIEVABLE about RADICAL TERRORISTS PULLING OFF that awful plot? LEAVE THIS ALONE and let everyone who passed that day REST IN PEACE, this is like saying that Jews were not persecuted by Hitler!! Christ!!!
If you'd lost someone, you'd be upset too.
2006-10-15 15:57:50 · answer #8 · answered by Porterhouse 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, try thousands of pounds of ignited jet fuel! Great research there! Give me a break......
2006-10-15 15:57:34 · answer #9 · answered by bardstale 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Thank you for the link. All the NEOCON sheep that have been abusing us over the years will have to go into darkened rooms and do the decent thing.
We have always know that WTC was 'pulled' to use Silverstein's own words but the Sheeple refuse to accept it. Maybe this will help.
2006-10-15 15:54:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋