English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who's shoes are better in terms of style & wear 'n' tear?

2006-10-15 15:15:26 · 22 answers · asked by xander 1 in Beauty & Style Fashion & Accessories

22 answers

converse are classics always lovely...
vans are pretty rad... not as killer style but they both are pretty have the same durability, i prefer converse though, they stand through permanent marker, boarding and daily activties. ive had the same pair for about 3 yrs and my vans last about 2 - 2 1/2 yrs... <3amy

2006-10-15 15:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Converse

2006-10-15 15:50:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wear and tear probably Vans. Personally I think bubblegum pink converse are really cool.

2006-10-16 04:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by katem1992 3 · 0 0

Converse wear and tear quickly, but they are more stylish.

Vans are wide and bulky. They may be more comfortable and last longer. I can't say because I have narrow feet and thin ankles, so Vans are all wrong for me.

2006-10-15 15:20:28 · answer #4 · answered by limendoz 5 · 0 1

You'd better search for these canvas & lace called Sperry. They're vans alike but they're classy. Vans are for hommies, y'know.
Converse fit in the rocker wardrobe, but gotta be clean.

2006-10-15 16:47:25 · answer #5 · answered by »»§@N†I@ĞǾ2Ụ™«« 5 · 0 0

In my opinion, Vans are a high quality shoe.

2006-10-15 15:22:56 · answer #6 · answered by Daphne 3 · 0 0

i think converse is better than vans because converse is old style and i like old style stuff

2006-10-15 15:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by daisyy♥ 2 · 0 1

I think Vans are more stylish - but for wear and tear -- try Airwalks!

2006-10-15 15:46:23 · answer #8 · answered by bymyshoes 2 · 0 0

Deffo Vans on both counts.

2006-10-15 15:29:12 · answer #9 · answered by jizzi 4 · 0 0

Vans. Converse suck.

2006-10-15 15:17:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers